2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: Accuracy and uncertainty analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
202
3
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 373 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
202
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest influences on the amplitude (0.1%) were found for the pH in the maps generated by ISD, and the biggest influence was for Fe (-80.2%) by kriging. Generally, the kriging presented a greater influence at the increasing of the minimum value and at the reduction of the maximum value when comparing the interpolated values to the original values (Table 3), corroborating the results of Xie et al (2011). However, the kriging was the method that influenced the mean and median the least.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The smallest influences on the amplitude (0.1%) were found for the pH in the maps generated by ISD, and the biggest influence was for Fe (-80.2%) by kriging. Generally, the kriging presented a greater influence at the increasing of the minimum value and at the reduction of the maximum value when comparing the interpolated values to the original values (Table 3), corroborating the results of Xie et al (2011). However, the kriging was the method that influenced the mean and median the least.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…They also provided two possible explanations for the low accuracy: (1) regression-kriging and ordinary kriging are not capable of dealing with many hotspots (sporadic high values); and (2) a relatively coarse resolution of the predictors is a limitation to mapping accuracy. Xie et al [23] applied four different interpolation methods (inverse distance weighting, local polynomial, ordinary kriging and radial basis functions) to map the spatial distribution of three toxic metals (Cd, Cu, Pb) in soil in a small area (605 km 2 ) in Beijing. The results showed that all of the interpolation methods provided a high accuracy based on cross-validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al analizar el contraste de cada mapa se encontró que con KO se tuvo el mayor ajuste (X 2* KO = 0.48) menor que 0.86 de IDW y por ende KO es más ef iciente en la predicción de la presencia de As en la región. Este resultado es acorde con lo reportado por otros investigadores, quienes mencionan que el interpolador más popular y rápido es Kriging (Isaaks y Srivastava, 1989;Xie et al, 2011).…”
Section: Arsénico En Los Suelos Del Dr017 En La Comarca Laguneraunclassified