2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-013-0316-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of phytoplankton cells in small elongated lakes subject to weak diurnal wind forcing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is now accepted that high vertical modes are often excited, observations of such modes were sparse until the end of the 20th century (Heaps, 1961;LaZerte, 1980;Csanady, 1982;Hutter et al, 1983). Currently, the importance of internal wave fields in redistributing wind energy within lakes is well known (Wüest et al, 2000;Stocker and Imberger, 2003;Shimizu and Imberger, 2008) and different authors have focused on its impact on mixing (Stevens, 1999;Planella et al, 2011;Bernhardt and Kirillin, 2013), sediment resuspension (Bogucki and Redekopp, 2008) and sediment and phytoplankton transportation (Ji and Jin, 2006;Rolland et al, 2013;Vidal et al, 2014). While studies of internal waves in small and large lakes are now quite common, for most of them, the characteristic internal seiche field has not been described in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is now accepted that high vertical modes are often excited, observations of such modes were sparse until the end of the 20th century (Heaps, 1961;LaZerte, 1980;Csanady, 1982;Hutter et al, 1983). Currently, the importance of internal wave fields in redistributing wind energy within lakes is well known (Wüest et al, 2000;Stocker and Imberger, 2003;Shimizu and Imberger, 2008) and different authors have focused on its impact on mixing (Stevens, 1999;Planella et al, 2011;Bernhardt and Kirillin, 2013), sediment resuspension (Bogucki and Redekopp, 2008) and sediment and phytoplankton transportation (Ji and Jin, 2006;Rolland et al, 2013;Vidal et al, 2014). While studies of internal waves in small and large lakes are now quite common, for most of them, the characteristic internal seiche field has not been described in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In small lakes, 3D hydrodynamic modelling has been performed to investigate the fate and transport of buoyant storm-river water and the implications of plume mixing dynamics on lake ecological functioning [56]. Other recent studies have investigated the effects of ice layers on small lake hydrodynamics and thermal structure [50], and the effect of wind-driven circulation on phytoplankton distribution [68]. However, the 3D modelling of small upland lakes remains uncommon, probably because 1D models are considered adequate to resolve the evolution of lake thermal structure at seasonal and longer timescales [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind plays an important role in the distribution of phytoplankton by mixing the surface layer (Cyr, 2017;Liu et al, 2012;Monismith and MacIntyre, 2009).The strength and effect of these shear forces depends on the wind speed (Boegman, 2009;Cyr, 2017;Kim et al, 2014). The patchiness of phytoplankton in lakes and reservoirs disappears at wind speeds above 3-4 m s -1 (Hunter et al, 2008;Vidal et al, 2014). During this study, the maximum wind speed reached 12.3 m s -1 , but the mean wind speed was only 1.1 m s -1 , with the main wind direction from the south-southwest (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics and maximal biomass of phytoplankton are driven by a wide range of factors including abiotic factors such as hydrological conditions and biotic variables like the presence of lter-feeders (Havens et al, 2017;Kuo and Wu, 2016). As a result, the distribution of phytoplankton is site-speci c and notoriously patchy and dynamic (Cyr, 2017).Distribution is often disturbed by factors such as precipitation or wind over short-term scales (Serra et al, 2007;Vidal et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2017). Understanding the ecological consequences of phytoplankton community and distribution change in the water column caused by different variables acting on spatial and temporal scales is a challenge for controlling ecosystem productivity (Serra et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%