2022
DOI: 10.2478/geosc-2022-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of military bases and power of interest groups in an emergent democracy

Abstract: Policies in liberal democracies can never be fully sheltered from the influence of interest groups. This is especially true for the flawed or immature democracies that can be found also in the post-communist world. In this study, we argue that the progress of democratization in Czechia has been accompanied by a growing influence of interest groups (local/regional governments, political parties, industrial corporations) on national defence strategy. Focusing on the spatial policy of military base distribution, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is enforced by democratic political and military elites (Frič and Pernica, 2022) who shape the defence programme (Enthoven and Smith, 2005) and the defence institution (Dvorak and Pernica, 2021). The presence of the iron triangle, the play of interests group affecting defence policy (Pernica and Ženka, 2022), an excessive profit of defence contractors (Wang and Miguel, 2012) and political sponsorship by suppliers (Pernica, 2020) is typical for institutionalised corruption (Caiden, 1988), a situation when public goods and services are organised by institutions thought in democracy as protectors from corruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is enforced by democratic political and military elites (Frič and Pernica, 2022) who shape the defence programme (Enthoven and Smith, 2005) and the defence institution (Dvorak and Pernica, 2021). The presence of the iron triangle, the play of interests group affecting defence policy (Pernica and Ženka, 2022), an excessive profit of defence contractors (Wang and Miguel, 2012) and political sponsorship by suppliers (Pernica, 2020) is typical for institutionalised corruption (Caiden, 1988), a situation when public goods and services are organised by institutions thought in democracy as protectors from corruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%