2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00159-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of heterotrophs and nitrifiers in a submerged biofilter for nitrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
2
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
45
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous investigations of mixed biofilm communities of heterotrophic and nitrifying bacteria from wastewater treatment have demonstrated competition for space and O 2 between these two groups of microorganisms (12,35,51). Due to significantly lower specific growth rate and dependency on O 2 , the nitrifiers can establish persistent populations only in biofilm strata where the heterotrophs are limited by substrate and not by O 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several previous investigations of mixed biofilm communities of heterotrophic and nitrifying bacteria from wastewater treatment have demonstrated competition for space and O 2 between these two groups of microorganisms (12,35,51). Due to significantly lower specific growth rate and dependency on O 2 , the nitrifiers can establish persistent populations only in biofilm strata where the heterotrophs are limited by substrate and not by O 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The carbon loading used in this part of study, 5.71 ±0.16 kg COD/m 3 .d, was much higher than the loadings used by Wijeyekoon (Table 9.4), and therefore nitrifiers were not only displaced further away from the feed source, but also buried deeper into the biofilm (Ohashi et al 1995). Fdz-Polanco et al (2000) also observed that as the amount of organic carbon entering the filter increases, the nitrification activity is displaced to the upper part of the filter in an upflow process. Quyang et al (2000) also argued that the differences in biological activity at different filter heights were due to their varying loadings.…”
Section: Glass Beads Concentrations (G/l)mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The denitrification process may also be disrupted because the biofilm provides potential anaerobic conditions in which denitrification flourishes. Fdz-Polanco et al (2000) pointed out the importance of understanding the spatial distribution of the microbial population, and its activity, for the optimisation of nitrogen removal performance in reactors treating wastewater. The performance of the full and partial-bed reactors for nitrogen removal has been examined (Fatihah 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the biofilm processes, it could maintain a high cellular retention time, even at low HRT [27], and then nitrobacteria would be able to multiply. When the ratios of COD : NH þ 4 -N were fairly low (i.e., lower than 4 [28]), nitrobacteria would become the prevalent microbes in the biofilm. Consequently, nitrification would occur.…”
Section: Organic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%