2012
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201011131626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of carbon density in grassland vegetation of the Loess Plateau of China

Abstract: Grassland is an important and terrestrial ecosystem and one of the most widely distributed ecosystems in the world. In the context of climate change, grassland has a significant impact on global carbon source / sink dynamics and carbon cycling. The focus of the present study was the grassland vegetation of the Loess Plateau. We analyzed the effects of natural and degraded grassland grazing pre鄄 and post鄄prohibition to combine the policy of returning farmland to forest or grassland and grazing prohibition. Usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial distribution of the difference in NPP estimated by both the methods shows that the simulated NPP is comparably higher toward the western, eastern, and lower parts of the YRB, while the simulated values are less toward the western parts of the basin center (Figure 5) due to several factors, including vegetation type, precipitation, and temperature. Further, the NPP estimated by the CASA model was compared with the observed NPP values reported by [43]. The model's accuracy was verified by comparing the in situ observed NPP values for grass, shrub, and forest cover at 36 data points with the estimated results of the CASA model, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Validation Of Casa Model Nppmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The spatial distribution of the difference in NPP estimated by both the methods shows that the simulated NPP is comparably higher toward the western, eastern, and lower parts of the YRB, while the simulated values are less toward the western parts of the basin center (Figure 5) due to several factors, including vegetation type, precipitation, and temperature. Further, the NPP estimated by the CASA model was compared with the observed NPP values reported by [43]. The model's accuracy was verified by comparing the in situ observed NPP values for grass, shrub, and forest cover at 36 data points with the estimated results of the CASA model, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Validation Of Casa Model Nppmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…After reviewing the relevant literature, the carbon density (Carbon storage per unit area) data was corrected [ 6 , 31 , 32 ]. SRB's climate conditions were utilized to obtain the final carbon density values for every land use type [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From calculation (2) , (3) , (4) , (5) , (6) , (7) , (8) , it follows that the value of K BP is 0.037, K BT is 0.967, K B is 0.036 and K S is 0.669. Building on existing references [ 31 , 32 , 36 ], the corrected carbon density data of SRB is obtained by multiplying the carbon density correction coefficient with the national carbon density value ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The dry weight of grasslands in the aboveground parts was measured by drying the aboveground biomass from the sample sites in a laboratory drying oven (drying at a constant 65 • C until the mass was constant). Then, the aboveground carbon storage of grasslands was obtained by multiplying the dry weight of grasslands in the aboveground parts by the 0.45 coefficient [32,33]. (3) Based on the measured aboveground vegetation carbon (AVC) of grasslands and the NDVI, a linear regression model of AVC = 376.95NDVI−28.20 (R 2 = 0.84) was used to simulate the AVC of grasslands in Yanchi County.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%