2021
DOI: 10.5194/soil-7-511-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of argan tree influence on soil properties in southern Morocco

Abstract: Abstract. The endemic argan tree (Argania spinosa) populations in southern Morocco are highly degraded due to overbrowsing, illegal firewood extraction and the expansion of intensive agriculture. Bare areas between the isolated trees increase due to limited regrowth; however, it is unknown if the trees influence the soil of the intertree areas. Hypothetically, spatial differences in soil parameters of the intertree area should result from the translocation of litter or soil particles (by runoff and erosion or … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean steady-state infiltration capacity in small clearings was almost three times higher than in the large clearing, supporting the conclusions of previous studies on the hydrological impacts of gaps in the tree canopy in other systems such as agroforestry parklands (Bargués-Tobella et al, 2014. The difference in soil hydrological properties between large and small clearings in our study can be explained in part by a tree proximity effect (Kirchhoff et al, 2021;Yadessa et al, 2001;Zinke, 1962). As well as the influence trees have on the area under their canopy, they may also impact neighboring open areas through the activity of their roots, which extend beyond the canopy edge (Bargués-Tobella et al, 2014;Benegas, 2013;Dunkerley, 2000;Lyford & Qashu, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Mean steady-state infiltration capacity in small clearings was almost three times higher than in the large clearing, supporting the conclusions of previous studies on the hydrological impacts of gaps in the tree canopy in other systems such as agroforestry parklands (Bargués-Tobella et al, 2014. The difference in soil hydrological properties between large and small clearings in our study can be explained in part by a tree proximity effect (Kirchhoff et al, 2021;Yadessa et al, 2001;Zinke, 1962). As well as the influence trees have on the area under their canopy, they may also impact neighboring open areas through the activity of their roots, which extend beyond the canopy edge (Bargués-Tobella et al, 2014;Benegas, 2013;Dunkerley, 2000;Lyford & Qashu, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…During the collection process, particular attention was paid to the representativeness of the samples. Sampling points were chosen at the dripline of tree canopies to ensure that the collected soil samples truly reflected the soil characteristics of the area [16]. Additionally, to avoid interference from fertilization, sampling was deliberately avoided in fertilized areas.…”
Section: Soil Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But tree count is clearly too simple an indicator for forest dynamics when trees are at risk of unsustainable use due to high demands on livestock forage, firewood and charcoal. Tree canopy cover-composed of individual tree-crown sizes-is more interesting, because soil conditions under the crown differ significantly from the area between the tree crowns and would thus give an indication about relative differences in e.g., soil water content, soil organic carbon or aggregate stability (Kirchhoff et al, 2019;Kirchhoff et al, 2021).…”
Section: Monitoring Tree-crown Size With Historical and Recent Vhrs I...mentioning
confidence: 99%