2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10144-014-0454-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution and settlement strategies in willow ptarmigan

Abstract: In heterogeneous landscapes individuals select among several habitat patches. The fitness rewards of these choices are assumed to play an important role in the distribution of individuals across landscapes. Individuals can either use environmental cues to directly assess the quality of breeding sites, or rely on social cues to guide the settlement decision. We estimated the density of adult birds and per capita reproductive success of willow ptarmigan over 5-15 years in 42 survey areas, nested within 5 spatial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, reduced carrying capacity induced by habitat loss will not necessarily reduce per capita reproductive output directly, so much that it forces adults to vacate poorer areas in favor of more suitable habitat. Something similar has been observed in willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus), in which reproduction seems to be spatially independent (Hörnell-Willebrand et al, 2006;Kvasnes et al, 2014).…”
Section: Intensified Land-usementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, reduced carrying capacity induced by habitat loss will not necessarily reduce per capita reproductive output directly, so much that it forces adults to vacate poorer areas in favor of more suitable habitat. Something similar has been observed in willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus), in which reproduction seems to be spatially independent (Hörnell-Willebrand et al, 2006;Kvasnes et al, 2014).…”
Section: Intensified Land-usementioning
confidence: 65%
“…The main idea is to establish a source-sink dynamic (Pulliam, 1988) between harvested and non-harvested areas (see e.g., Novaro et al, 2005). So far, the effect of refuges on ptarmigan population dynamics remains unclear because of uncertainty related to the spatial distribution and settlement strategies (Kvasnes et al, 2015). Besides from addressing hunting effort, regulations aiming to reduce the hunting efficiency may also be implemented.…”
Section: Limiting Total Hunting Effort or Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Willow Ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus) is a medium-sized grouse distributed in alpine tundra habitats in the northern hemisphere (Johnsgard 1983). They have a short generation time (T = 1.8, Sandercock et al 2005 andannual mortality[46 %, Sandercock et al 2011;Smith and Willebrand 1999) and each female may produce up to 12 chicks annually, although recruitment of juveniles as well as densities of breeding birds vary both in time and space (Johnsgard 1983;Kvasnes et al 2013). Several studies have documented that weather conditions during the breeding season can influence recruitment rates in ptarmigan (Hannon and Martin 2006;Novoa et al 2008;Slagsvold 1975;Martin and Wiebe 2004;Steen et al 1988a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%