2011
DOI: 10.1175/2010waf2222422.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Distribution and Evolution of Extratropical Cyclone Errors over North America and its Adjacent Oceans in the NCEP Global Forecast System Model

Abstract: Short-to medium-range (1-5 day) forecasts of extratropical cyclones around North America and its adjacent oceans are verified within the Global Forecast System (GFS) model at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) during the 2002-07 cool seasons (October-March). Cyclones in the immediate lee of the Rockies and U.S. Great Plains have 25%-50% smaller pressure errors than other regions after hour 36. The central pressure and displacement errors are largest over the central and eastern Pacific fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation of forecast skill and atmospheric predictability to large-scale flow anomalies (AO, NAO, ENSO, and others) is an issue of some importance, since the onset and persistence of certain atmospheric flow regimes can have significant effects on model performance (Ferranti et al, 2002;Simmons and Hollingsworth, 2002;Archambault et al, 2008), and on reliability in forecasts of extreme and high-impact weather events including mid-latitude extratropical cyclone activity (Colle and Charles, 2011).…”
Section: P U B L I S H E D B Y T H E I N T E R N a T I O N A L M E T mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation of forecast skill and atmospheric predictability to large-scale flow anomalies (AO, NAO, ENSO, and others) is an issue of some importance, since the onset and persistence of certain atmospheric flow regimes can have significant effects on model performance (Ferranti et al, 2002;Simmons and Hollingsworth, 2002;Archambault et al, 2008), and on reliability in forecasts of extreme and high-impact weather events including mid-latitude extratropical cyclone activity (Colle and Charles, 2011).…”
Section: P U B L I S H E D B Y T H E I N T E R N a T I O N A L M E T mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis to be tested is as follows: given a reasonably selected set of targeted observations, forecasts that incorporate the assimilation of these additional observations will be significantly more skillful than forecasts that do not, and the extra observations will be especially important for cases with anticipated highimpact weather, often associated with rapidly developing cyclones and the rapid growth of forecast error. Examples of cases in which large forecast errors are associated with deepening cyclones are presented in Colle and Charles (2011). Further, we hypothesize that the impact of the targeted observations will be larger in specific downstream ''verification regions'' focused on the expected area with high-impact weather and that the impact will be smaller when evaluated over continental-sized areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skill of numerical weather prediction models in forecasting extratropical cyclones varies regionally and temporally (Charles and Colle 2009;Colle and Charles 2011;Froude et al 2007). The skill of numerical weather prediction models in forecasting extratropical cyclones varies regionally and temporally (Charles and Colle 2009;Colle and Charles 2011;Froude et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%