2018
DOI: 10.1177/1940082918797856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Data Are Key to Sustainability Standards Increasing and Demonstrating Their Impact

Abstract: Spatial data are increasingly ubiquitous and accessible. Understanding precisely where certified farms are located in relation to other variables can help uncover their potential to influence biodiversity, forest cover, and local livelihoods. Spatial mapping opens up many opportunities for sustainability standards organizations to test, understand, and demonstrate their impact. However, the potential of spatial data remains largely unrecognized and underdeveloped. For our recent analysis, we mapped certified f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transparency is increasingly becoming the new norm (Mol, 2008), forcing businesses in particular (Vaccaro & Madsen, 2009), but also NGOs and public agencies, to disclose production-and investment-related information ( Van Oorschot et al, 2018). Reputation mechanisms can bring about a change in behaviour through naming, faming, and shaming (Arts, 2003;Gardner et al, 2019;Héritier, 2002;Keskitalo et al, 2009;Pattberg, 2005), while new digital data collection and analysis tools are creating more opportunities (Soma et al, 2016) to hold members accountable and increase the impacts of ICIs as well as other actors (Karpouzoglou et al, 2016;Tayleur & Phalan, 2018).…”
Section: Monitoring and Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transparency is increasingly becoming the new norm (Mol, 2008), forcing businesses in particular (Vaccaro & Madsen, 2009), but also NGOs and public agencies, to disclose production-and investment-related information ( Van Oorschot et al, 2018). Reputation mechanisms can bring about a change in behaviour through naming, faming, and shaming (Arts, 2003;Gardner et al, 2019;Héritier, 2002;Keskitalo et al, 2009;Pattberg, 2005), while new digital data collection and analysis tools are creating more opportunities (Soma et al, 2016) to hold members accountable and increase the impacts of ICIs as well as other actors (Karpouzoglou et al, 2016;Tayleur & Phalan, 2018).…”
Section: Monitoring and Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%