1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00144-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial correspondence between tactile projection patterns and the distribution of the antigenic Purkinje cell markers anti-zebrin I and anti-zebrin II in the cerebellar folium crus IIa of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the origin of the participating mossy fibers was not specified in that study. Congruence of peripherally triggered mossy fibers and climbing fibers has been shown by comparing the receptive fields of peripheral mossy and climbing fibers responses in a selected region of crus 2 (Brown and Bower, 2001) and by relating this to the zonal distribution of the zebrin pattern of Purkinje cells (Hallem et al, 1999). Cerebrally evoked somatosensory mossy fiber responses have been shown to be in register with the peripherally evoked patterning (Bower et al, 1981).…”
Section: Modular Organization Of Climbing and Mossy Fiber Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the origin of the participating mossy fibers was not specified in that study. Congruence of peripherally triggered mossy fibers and climbing fibers has been shown by comparing the receptive fields of peripheral mossy and climbing fibers responses in a selected region of crus 2 (Brown and Bower, 2001) and by relating this to the zonal distribution of the zebrin pattern of Purkinje cells (Hallem et al, 1999). Cerebrally evoked somatosensory mossy fiber responses have been shown to be in register with the peripherally evoked patterning (Bower et al, 1981).…”
Section: Modular Organization Of Climbing and Mossy Fiber Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The situation is much less clear with regard to the mossy fiber systems. Different cerebellar lobules or areas tend to receive mossy fibers from distinct sources (Brodal, 1981;Ito, 1984), and some relationship to the aldolase C compartments has been reported for mossy fiber projections from the basilar pontine nucleus , lateral reticular nucleus (Ruigrok and Cella, 1995;, external cuneate nucleus (ECuN), spinal cord (Matsushita et al, 1991;Ji and Hawkes, 1994;Akintunde and Eisenman, 1994), and trigeminal system (Hallem et al, 1999). However, these studies do not supply information on the actual density or arrangements of mossy fiber rosettes, since they were done with retrograde labeling, mass anterograde labeling, or receptive field mapping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The granular layer is also subdivided into stripes (for review, see Ozol and Hawkes, 1997) that also align with the overlying Purkinje cell compartments [e.g., mossy fiber terminal fields (Matsushita et al, 1991;Akintunde and Eisenman, 1994;Ji and Hawkes, 1994;Voogd et al, 2003;Pijpers et al, 2006)], and an elaborate mosaic of patches is revealed both in tactile receptive field maps (Welker, 1987) and by histological treatments (Hawkes et al, , 1998. Finally, functional studies have also demonstrated parasagittal stripes in the cerebellum Larson, 1973, 1980) (for review, see Voogd et al, 1996) with direct correlations with particular Purkinje cell stripes (Chockkan and Hawkes, 1994;Chen et al, 1996;Hallem et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%