2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial correlograms of soil cover as an indicator of landscape heterogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mathematical expressions and ecological meanings of these metrics representing different landscape aspects are listed in Appendix C of the FRAGSTATS software manual (McGarigal et al, 2002). According to previous studies, the input pixel size of the land use map principally influences the analytical metric results (Liu et al, 2005;Uuemaa et al, 2005Uuemaa et al, , 2008Ouyang et al, 2009). In this study, we selected 200 m as the input pixel size based on previous studies (Uuemaa et al, 2008;Ouyang et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Landscape Metric Selection and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mathematical expressions and ecological meanings of these metrics representing different landscape aspects are listed in Appendix C of the FRAGSTATS software manual (McGarigal et al, 2002). According to previous studies, the input pixel size of the land use map principally influences the analytical metric results (Liu et al, 2005;Uuemaa et al, 2005Uuemaa et al, , 2008Ouyang et al, 2009). In this study, we selected 200 m as the input pixel size based on previous studies (Uuemaa et al, 2008;Ouyang et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Landscape Metric Selection and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some approaches were tested to eliminate the effects of factors such as grain, extent, and classification scheme on landscape metrics, they are rarely found to have good applicability (Wu, 2004;Corry, 2005;. Uuemaa et al (2005Uuemaa et al ( , 2008 demonstrated that responses of landscape metrics to changing grain size vary among landscapes and metrics, such as patch density and edge density decreasing sharply within the 100 m grain size and then fluctuating slightly; the contagion decreasing significantly up to a grain size of 400 m then fluctuating with further increases in grain size for all landscapes; Shannon's diversity index and evenness index decreasing up to one patch at the 400 m grain size; mean shape index decreasing significantly up to a grain size of 100 m and from 200 m showing erratic responses to increasing grain size. Therefore, in this study, we selected 200 m as the input pixel size based on the spatial resolution of Landsat MSS (80 m) and TM (30 m) images and methods followed in other studies (Uuemaa et al, 2008;.…”
Section: Landscape Metrics For Assessing the Impact Of Dam Constructimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we used Shannon's diversity index (SHDI) and contagion index (CONTAG) to perform landscape analysis at the city level. SHDI is an index based on information theory widely applied in landscape ecology studies [26]. This index indicates the patch diversity in the landscape and equals 0 when the landscape contains only one patch.…”
Section: Framework Of Probing Into Urbanization and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understanding of such relationships is fundamental to understand the ecosystem dynamics (Fortin and Dale 2005;Zurlini and Girardin 2008;Boscolo and Metzger 2009). Multi-scale effects have been explored in aquatic systems (Cassandra et al 2008), landscape changing patterns (Walz 2008), impact assessment on preserved areas (Zaccarelli et al 2008), bird incidence in fragmented landscapes (Boscolo and Metzger 2009) and chironomid taxon associations in neotropical streams (Roque et al (in press)), however has hardly been addressed relative to medium and large mammals distribution (but see Comiskey et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%