2023
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202205800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Control of Substitutional Dopants in Hexagonal Monolayer WS2: The Effect of Edge Termination

Abstract: The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205800.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in chemical potential of the S‐zigzag and W‐zigzag boundary is used to explain the spatial distribution inhomogeneity in hexagonal WS 2 . [ 29 ] However, triangular WS 2 domains have uniform edge structures, so the mechanism could not be used to explain the CPS phenomenon in our experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in chemical potential of the S‐zigzag and W‐zigzag boundary is used to explain the spatial distribution inhomogeneity in hexagonal WS 2 . [ 29 ] However, triangular WS 2 domains have uniform edge structures, so the mechanism could not be used to explain the CPS phenomenon in our experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Zhang et al controlled the spatial distribution of dopants by utilizing the different chemical potentials of the W-zigzag and S-zigzag edges of hexagonal WS 2 . [29] Nevertheless, the synthesis of hexagonal WS 2 requires precisely controlled conditions, and it is difficult to identify regions with different doping concentrations easily, which needs to rely on spectral recognition. In addition, the morphology of monolayer TMDCs is usually triangular rather than hexagonal, so it is necessary to explore the spatial distribution of triangular morphology of TMDCs domains that have uniform edge structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain introduced by a rapid shift from equilibrium growth conditions is the most plausible explanation for the observed shifts in the energy of and disorder in PL. However, we also sought to address the possibility that chemical doping may be responsible for the observed spatial variations in PL, as has recently been shown in CVD-grown TMDs . X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of salt-assisted 2D WSe 2 crystals grown on SiO 2 substrates shows no photoelectron signal from either Na 1s (expected at 1072 eV) or Cl 2p (expected at 198 eV) states (Figure S13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we also sought to address the possibility that chemical doping may be responsible for the observed spatial variations in PL, as has recently been shown in CVD-grown TMDs. 52 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of salt-assisted 2D WSe 2 crystals grown on SiO 2 substrates shows no photoelectron signal from either Na 1s (expected at 1072 eV) or Cl 2p (expected at 198 eV) states (Figure S13). These data indicate that neither Na nor Cl is incorporated into the crystal lattice or adsorbed onto its surface after reaction.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks of in-plane vibration (E 2g ) and out-of-plane vibration (A 1g ) modes located at 350.8 cm −1 and 416.9 cm −1 are observed, respectively, which are consistent with the monolayer WS 2 . [35][36][37][38][39] It is to be noted that the A 1g peak is shifted from 416.9 (pristine WS 2 ) to 418.7 cm −1 (WS 2 (Er/Yb)), which could be attributed to the Er 3+ /Yb 3+ ions doping. [21] In addition, the Raman peak intensities of the WS 2 (Er/Yb) are approximately 2.5 times enhanced compared with those of the pristine WS 2 , implying the more active molecular vibration of WS 2 (Er/Yb).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%