Spatial context affects the Poggendorff illusion

Abstract

The Poggendorffillusion has often been explained as purely an interaction between the parallels and the transversals. The present study demonstrates that additional spatial context exerts an influence on this illusion. In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of a surrounding tilted frame (complete and degraded versions) on collinearity adjustments in the upright and rotated Poggendorff figures. The frame's orientation was always oblique. Relative to the no-frame condition, frames decreased error in collinearity adjustments in the upright Poggendorff figure, and increased error in the rotated Poggendorff figure. In Experiment 2, a circumscribing circle did not cause an orientation-inhibition effect (Ebenholtz & Utrie, 1982, suggesting that the effect of the frame on the Poggendorff illusion may not be closely related to the rod-and-frame effect. In Experiment 3, orientation of a central texture modulated the magnitude of the illusion. The results do not serve to explain the mechanisms behind the Poggendorffillusion, but they do demonstrate the importance of visual reference frames in understanding perceived misalignment.

Factors Influencing Haptic Perception of Complex Shapes

“…In the haptic experiments, subjects had to adjust the shape of the visual display to match the perceived shape, and in the analysis, we assumed that the visually generated shape was a veridical match to the one that was perceived, i.e., that no visual illusions were present [10], [13], [14]. We also assumed that inaccuracies in judging offsets visually were minimal.…”

The Influence of Verbal Labeling on the Perception of Odors: Evidence for Olfactory Illusions?

“…The Mu« ller-Lyer illusion is the most definitive example, where the direction of the tails of the figure, either feathering (making the line look longer) or arrowhead (making the line look shorter), influence perceived length. A number of other experimental examinations support the influence of visual context in creating visual illusions (Ku« nnapas 1955;Schiffman and Thompson 1978;Spivey-Knowlton and Bridgeman 1993). However, illusory effects are not limited to the situation where aspects within the same sensory system induce the illusion (ie visual context and a visual stimulus).…”

Sex Differences in Susceptibility to the Poggendorff Illusion

“…Whatever the underlying mechanism(s) may be, the Poggendorff illusion depends on the spatial context within which it is viewed (Spivey- Knowlton & Bridgeman, 1993;Prinzmetal & Beck, 2001). Because the dusion is bound to diminish or even disappear when the figure is tilted so that the interrupting lines intersect vertically (at 90") or horizontally (at 180°), it is likely that a person's spatial visuhzation skills, such as the ab~lity to rotate complex figures mentally, are among the predictors of the amount of &stortion.…”