Spatial constancy of attention across eye movements is mediated by the presence of visual objects

Lisi, Matteo; Cavanagh, Patrick; Zorzi, Marco

doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0861-1

Cited by 22 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 54 publications

(88 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lisi, Cavanagh, & Zorzi (2015) found that presenting objects continuously throughout a saccade allowed for more stable spatiotopic attention than when objects disappeared before a saccade (see also Deubel, Bridgeman, & Schneider, 1998; Deubel, Schneider, & Bridgeman, 1996). Demeyer et al (2010) similarly found the most spatiotopic integration between subtly different stimuli when pre- and post-saccadic stimuli were continuously present across a saccade, and this integration disappeared entirely when they were separated by a blank and a mask.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias

Shafer-Skelton

Kupitz

Golomb

2017

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite frequent eye movements that rapidly shift the locations of objects on our retinas, our visual system creates a stable perception of the world. To do this, it must convert eye-centered (retinotopic) input to world-centered (spatiotopic) percepts. Moreover, for successful behavior we must also incorporate information about object features/identities during this updating – a fundamental challenge that remains to be understood. Here we adapted a recent behavioral paradigm, the “Spatial Congruency Bias”, to investigate object-location binding across an eye movement. In two initial baseline experiments, we showed that the Spatial Congruency Bias was present for both gabor and face stimuli in addition to the object stimuli used in the original paradigm. Then, across three main experiments, we found the bias was preserved across an eye movement, but only in retinotopic coordinates: Subjects were more likely to perceive two stimuli as having the same features/identity when they were presented in the same retinotopic location. Strikingly, there was no evidence of location binding in the more ecologically relevant spatiotopic (world-centered) coordinates; the reference frame did not update to spatiotopic even at longer post-saccade delays, nor did it transition to spatiotopic with more complex stimuli (gabors, shapes, and faces all showed a retinotopic Congruency Bias). Our results suggest that object-location binding may be tied to retinotopic coordinates, and that it may need to be re-established following each eye movement rather than being automatically updated to spatiotopic coordinates.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias

Shafer-Skelton

Kupitz

Golomb

2017

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, in our experiment no element was present at the original saccade target position in the search array. A recent study revealed that spatial updating of attention across eye movements depends critically on the continued presence of an object at the attended location both before the saccade and after its landing (Lisi, Cavanagh, & Zorzi, 2015). In our study, without this spatial continuity, attentional benefits might not have been transferred from the saccade target to the subsequent search elements.…”

Section: Landmark Search and Space Constancymentioning

confidence: 50%

Feature-based attention across saccades and immediate postsaccadic selection

Eymond

Cavanagh

Collins

2016

Atten Percept Psychophys

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Before each eye movement, attentional resources are drawn to the saccade goal. This saccaderelated attention is known to be spatial in nature, and in this study we asked whether it also evokes any feature selectivity that is maintained across the saccade. After a saccade toward a colored target, participants performed a postsaccadic feature search on an array displayed at landing. The saccade target either had the same color as the search target in the postsaccadic array (congruent trials) or a different color (incongruent or neutral trials). Our results show that the color of the saccade target did not prime the subsequent feature search. This suggests that Blandmark search^, the process of searching for the saccade target once the eye lands (Deubel in Visual Cognition, 11, 173-202, 2004), may not involve the attentional mechanisms that underlie feature search. We also analyzed intertrial effects and observed priming of pop-out (Maljkovic & Nakayama in Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672, 1994) for the postsaccadic feature search: the detection of the color singleton became faster when its color was repeated on successive trials. However, search performance revealed no effect of congruency between the saccade and search targets, either within or across trials, suggesting that the priming of pop-out is specific to target repetitions within the same task and is not seen for repetitions across tasks. Our results support a dissociation between feature-based attention and the attentional mechanisms associated with eye movement programming.

show abstract

“…Yao et al (2016) even find neither remapping nor lingering of attention in a psychophysical study with humans though these results are may be biased by their experimental design where remapped and lingering attention position were not only irrelevant, but importantly these positions were never target locations that tested the amount of attention. Lisi, Cavanagh, and Zorzi (2015) suggest, that spatial updating of attention depends on the setup of the experiment, namely whether visual objects, which can serve as spatial landmarks, are presented or not. In their experiments, they found that the lingering effect vanishes if a placeholder is shown at the attended location for the whole trial.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial updating of attention across eye movements: A neuro-computational approach

Bergelt

Hamker

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While scanning our environment, the retinal image changes with every saccade. Nevertheless, the visual system anticipates where an attended target will be next and attention is updated to the new location. Recently, two different types of perisaccadic attentional updates were discovered: Predictive remapping of attention before saccade onset (Rolfs, Jonikaitis, Deubel, & Cavanagh, 2011) as well as lingering of attention after saccade (Golomb, Chun, & Mazer, 2008;Golomb, Pulido, Albrecht, Chun, & Mazer, 2010). We here propose a neurocomputational model located in LIP based on a previous model of perisaccadic space perception (Ziesche & Hamker, 2011. Our model can account for both types of updating of attention at a neural systems level. The lingering effect originates from the late updating of the proprioceptive eye position signal and the remapping from the early corollary discharge signal. We put these results in relationship to predictive remapping of receptive fields and show that both phenomena arise from the same simple, recurrent neural circuit. Thus, together with the previously published results, the model provides a comprehensive framework to discuss multiple experimental observations that occur around saccades.

show abstract

Spatial constancy of attention across eye movements is mediated by the presence of visual objects

Cited by 22 publications

References 54 publications

Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias

Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias

Feature-based attention across saccades and immediate postsaccadic selection

Spatial updating of attention across eye movements: A neuro-computational approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About