1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-6383(98)90042-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial co-location and infants' learning of auditory-visual associations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another group of studies present a seeming conflict with the reported findings. Fenwick and Morrongiello (), studying the ability to form associations between non‐spatial auditory and visual stimuli, found that 6‐month‐old infants were insensitive to a 10 cm spatial discrepancy between auditory and visual events. In contrast to adults, Fenwick and Morrongiello's 6‐month‐old participants still formed crossmodal associations at this degree of spatial separation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of studies present a seeming conflict with the reported findings. Fenwick and Morrongiello (), studying the ability to form associations between non‐spatial auditory and visual stimuli, found that 6‐month‐old infants were insensitive to a 10 cm spatial discrepancy between auditory and visual events. In contrast to adults, Fenwick and Morrongiello's 6‐month‐old participants still formed crossmodal associations at this degree of spatial separation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on cross-modal perception in newborns and young infants has established an early coordination of hearing with other sense modalities ( Wertheimer, 1961 ; Turkewitz et al, 1966 ; Bower et al, 1970 ; Mendelson and Hath, 1976 ; Crassini and Broerse, 1980 ; Fenwick and Morrongiello, 1998 ; Morrongiello et al, 1998 ). Most developmental perception-action studies have employed parallel intermodal matching of auditory-visual relationships when investigating early infant behaviors ( Guihou and Vauclair, 2008 ).…”
Section: Auditory Stimuli and Body-behavior Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After habituation, the infants heard either the same word or one of the four variations created by altering the fundamental frequency of the original sound by 7%, 14%, 21%, or 28%. The infants were most likely to orient to a stimulus that altered the fundamental frequency by 14% or 21% (moderate discrepancies) and less likely to orient to the more extreme alteration (Weiss, Zelazo, & Swain, 1988; see also Fenwick & Morrongiello, 1998; Saffran, Loman, & Robertson, 2000). Three‐week‐olds looked longer at 2 × 2 checkerboards than at 8 × 8 and 24 × 24 designs; 8‐week‐olds looked longest at 8 × 8 checkerboards; and 14‐week‐olds stared longest at the 24 × 24 forms (Brennan, Ames, & Moore, 1966).…”
Section: A Trio Of Influences On Lookingmentioning
confidence: 99%