Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.80.6.526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial classification of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there is a tautology in that, in the absence of rules, how is such a training set derived? Henson and associates suggest that unsupervised neural networks can be used to resolve this dilemma, as they are self-classifying [24]. However, the patterns correspond to the number of nodes used in the neural network and do not necessarily correspond to clinically identified field defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is a tautology in that, in the absence of rules, how is such a training set derived? Henson and associates suggest that unsupervised neural networks can be used to resolve this dilemma, as they are self-classifying [24]. However, the patterns correspond to the number of nodes used in the neural network and do not necessarily correspond to clinically identified field defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 summarizes and illustrates these two approaches. In the simple hypothetical example (a), the prototype approach is illustrated by the popular cluster analysis algorithm k-means [8], an extension of which has recently been applied to VFs [9]. In our example, k-means partitions the cloud of points into four clusters.…”
Section: Two Approaches: Prototypes and Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 The generated field patterns and the analyzed SAP fields did not include age and were in 52-dimensional space. I will discuss the shapes in three-dimensional space, because it is easier to grasp cognitively.…”
Section: Change Along An Axismentioning
confidence: 99%