2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial characterization of the effect of age and sex on macular layer thicknesses and foveal pit morphology

Abstract: Characterizing the effect of age and sex on macular retinal layer thicknesses and foveal pit morphology is crucial to differentiating between natural and disease-related changes. We applied advanced image analysis techniques to optical coherence tomography (OCT) to: 1) enhance the spatial description of age and sex effects, and 2) create a detailed open database of normative retinal layer thickness maps and foveal pit shapes. The maculae of 444 healthy subjects (age range 21–88) were imaged with OCT. Using com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our PD and control cohorts were not matched for age and sex. As both variables correlate with OCT measurements 30 , 31 we accounted for these confounding variables in the statistical analyses. Moreover, the absence of pRNFL measurements and clinical data in the AlzEye dataset hindered our ability to validate all of our analyses in an external database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our PD and control cohorts were not matched for age and sex. As both variables correlate with OCT measurements 30 , 31 we accounted for these confounding variables in the statistical analyses. Moreover, the absence of pRNFL measurements and clinical data in the AlzEye dataset hindered our ability to validate all of our analyses in an external database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 Correction for age and sex is important when matching against normative data, because it was found that cone density, 28 , 32 as well as OSL, 33 , 34 decrease with age, and RT depends on sex, with males tending to have a thicker retina. 35 , 36 This approach was, however, unable to consider individual differences in cone density, which are shown to be significant (see next paragraph). In albinism, where the degree of fovealization varies, a strong positive correlation was observed between in vivo peak cone density and the thickness of the ONL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to its relative recency, a holistic understanding of how quantitative measurements derived from widefield OCT vary within healthy cohorts is lacking. In studies using central OCT protocols, variations in retinal thickness secondary to age, refractive error, axial length (AL), sex and ethnicity have been described, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] suggesting that compensation for these factors may be required before accurate comparisons to normative database measurements can be performed. An exploration of whether demographic variables similarly affect retinal measurements acquired using widefield OCT protocols would be valuable to identify potential confounders that could affect the accurate identification of pathology, and therefore ensure that subsequent normative databases are sufficiently representative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%