2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial capture-recapture design and modelling for the study of small mammals

Abstract: Spatial capture-recapture modelling (SCR) is a powerful analytical tool to estimate density and derive information on space use and behaviour of elusive animals. Yet, SCR has been seldom applied to the study of ecologically keystone small mammals. Here we highlight its potential and requirements with a case study on common voles (Microtus arvalis). First, we address mortality associated with live-trapping, which can be high in small mammals, and must be kept minimal. We designed and tested a nest box coupled w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each trap was baited with apple or carrot, which provide both food and water for trapped rodents. When the temperatures were low (autumn and winter), hydrophobic cotton was provided inside traps to increase survival (see Romairone et al 2018). Traps were set up in the morning, inspected after 24 h, and subsequently removed.…”
Section: Small Mammal Trapping and Abundance Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each trap was baited with apple or carrot, which provide both food and water for trapped rodents. When the temperatures were low (autumn and winter), hydrophobic cotton was provided inside traps to increase survival (see Romairone et al 2018). Traps were set up in the morning, inspected after 24 h, and subsequently removed.…”
Section: Small Mammal Trapping and Abundance Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of support for species-specific variation in either g 0 or σ strongly indicates that our density estimates were representative of a Peromyscus community that was comprised of multiple species with comparable space use and detectability [ 80 ]. We also found no evidence that g 0 or σ differed between the sexes, though we acknowledge the short survey duration that resulted in a relatively small number of sex-specific spatial recaptures may have contributed to this result [ 69 , 82 , 85 ]. Nevertheless, our estimated community density was similar to other spatially explicit estimates for Peromyscus in locales where environmental contamination was not a known issue [ 78 , 96 , 98 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A likelihood estimator for single-catch traps has not been developed yet (but see Distiller and Borchers [ 68 ]), but Efford et al [ 67 ] found that modeling single-catch traps as multi-catch can produce unbiased estimates of density if trap saturation is <86%. Therefore, after calculating trap saturation, or the average proportion of traps that were occupied at the end of each occasion, we modeled traps as multi-catch via a multinomial observation model [ 32 , 67 , 69 ]. Recaptures of multiple individuals occurred in traps that were located on >1 sampling grid (i.e., cross-grid captures), effectively constituting a pseudo-clustered sampling design; therefore, we collapsed the grid-specific capture histories into a single study area capture history with five occasions [ 41 , 70 , 71 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this pattern was not found in M. arvalis. The colonial lifestyle [58] and the aggressive behaviour of female voles [59] could increase the horizontal transmission in females, balancing the ea burden between male and female voles. However, male voles usually hosted the less frequent ea species; their higher mobility [58] may provoke the encountering with more diversity of ea species.…”
Section: Flea Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%