1972
DOI: 10.1029/jc077i030p05945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial aspects of pressure ridge statistics

Abstract: The spatial aspects of sea ice pressure ridge statistics have been examined by a census of all ridges in each of three small areas in the arctic basin. A model that predicts random orientation of ridges can be rejected at the 0.05 level of significance in each study area. Measurements of ridge spacings generally confirm the usefulness and validity of the probability density function P(x) dx = μe−μx dx. The estimator trueμˆ varies as a function of direction within the study areas, but a mean value 〈μ〉 is show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the measurement of ridge height (or depth), there is usually some uncertainty in the initial height; that is, there may be some consistent error in the ridge height or depth in the form of an additive constant. This hypothesis is tested in detail by Mock et al [1972] with reasonable agreement, To test the Potsson distribution, data from and so we do not feel it is necessary to carry laser profiles and photographs were used. use errors of 0.5 to 1.0 meter in the true water level are small compared to the mean ridge depth.…”
Section: Samples Passes the X • Test At The 5% Levelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the measurement of ridge height (or depth), there is usually some uncertainty in the initial height; that is, there may be some consistent error in the ridge height or depth in the form of an additive constant. This hypothesis is tested in detail by Mock et al [1972] with reasonable agreement, To test the Potsson distribution, data from and so we do not feel it is necessary to carry laser profiles and photographs were used. use errors of 0.5 to 1.0 meter in the true water level are small compared to the mean ridge depth.…”
Section: Samples Passes the X • Test At The 5% Levelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Castellani et al, 2014) simply measure the spacing between unique surface features along the linear profile, assuming that the features are randomly orientated and sufficiently sampled for this assumption to be valid. Mock et al (1972) showed that for randomly oriented ridges, the average ridge frequency, µ, and the average ridge density (the ratio of the total length of ridges per unit area), R D , are related via µ = (2/π )R D . In contrast to linear profiling studies, R D can be calculated directly with these data as R D = i L i / A tot = L tot / A tot , where the sum is over all features within the total ice/swath area (given a fully concentrated ice pack).…”
Section: Feature Geometry and The Potential For Additional Feature Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mock and others (1972) tested this relationship for surface ridges using aerial photographs, and found good agreement except for an excess of ridges at small spacings. On a purely random theory, however, we expect a deficit of ridges or keels at small spacings, on account of the so-called "ridge shadowing" effect (Wadhams,[CI980], in press) .…”
Section: Theory Of Spacingsmentioning
confidence: 99%