1989
DOI: 10.1037/h0084229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and verbal abilities in children's crossmodal recognition: A dual coding approach.

Abstract: A dual coding analysis suggests that performance on a tactual-to-visual shape recognition task could be based on either a nonverbal visual imagery strategy or a verbal referential naming strategy and that different ability variables should predict crossmodal recognition under imagery and naming strategies. In two experiments, 184 Kindergarten and Grade 1 children completed individual tests of visuospatial and verbal referential abilities prior to performing a crossmodal shape recognition task under imagery, na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
37
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For familiar objects, a visual representation can be evoked either visually or haptically, and this visual representation in turn can trigger the name of the object ( Johnson et al, 1989). Thus verbal processing is only involved to the extent that a verbal label can be activated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For familiar objects, a visual representation can be evoked either visually or haptically, and this visual representation in turn can trigger the name of the object ( Johnson et al, 1989). Thus verbal processing is only involved to the extent that a verbal label can be activated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson, Paivio, and Clark (1989) suggested that representations initiated in one modality can activate verbal representations if the object is identified as familiar. Representations of unfamiliar objects may also be subject to verbal recoding if a verbal description can be generated (Lacey & Campbell, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinction is especially important for representations whose content can be derived from multiple modalities and which therefore have several potential formats. Johnson et al (1989) proposed a dual-code account of cross-modal object representation, arguing that haptic input activates visual representations for both familiar and unfamiliar objects, but that this activation spreads to a verbal representation for familiar objects since these can be named. Although the performance of children instructed to use either visual or verbal strategies correlated with their visuo-spatial and verbal abilities (Johnson et al 1989), only familiar nameable shapes were used and thus the role of familiarity was not rigorously tested.…”
Section: Format Of Visuo^haptic Object Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson et al (1989) proposed a dual-code account of cross-modal object representation, arguing that haptic input activates visual representations for both familiar and unfamiliar objects, but that this activation spreads to a verbal representation for familiar objects since these can be named. Although the performance of children instructed to use either visual or verbal strategies correlated with their visuo-spatial and verbal abilities (Johnson et al 1989), only familiar nameable shapes were used and thus the role of familiarity was not rigorously tested. Since cross-modal memory has been demonstrated in preverbal infants and several animal species, it is unlikely that language acquisition or verbal strategies are fundamental to performance (Rose 1994).…”
Section: Format Of Visuo^haptic Object Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%