2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-012-0367-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal variation in genetic diversity of an endangered freshwater seal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
89
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
23
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nocturnal haulout behaviour of the Saimaa ringed seal is also suggested to be an adaptation to avoid human disturbance (Kunnasranta 2001. The present study supports previous findings, which have shown that Sai maa ringed seals exhibit a high degree of site fidelity (Kunnasranta 2001, Kos kela et al 2002, Valtonen et al 2012. In the present study, the median distance between haulout sites of individual seals was 2.5 km, with the maximum distances ranging from 4 to 23 km.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The nocturnal haulout behaviour of the Saimaa ringed seal is also suggested to be an adaptation to avoid human disturbance (Kunnasranta 2001. The present study supports previous findings, which have shown that Sai maa ringed seals exhibit a high degree of site fidelity (Kunnasranta 2001, Kos kela et al 2002, Valtonen et al 2012. In the present study, the median distance between haulout sites of individual seals was 2.5 km, with the maximum distances ranging from 4 to 23 km.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…stayed within an average distance of 5 km from their natal sites. These observations strongly support the findings of telemetric and genetic studies pointing to a high degree of site fidelity among Saimaa ringed seals (Hyvärinen et al 1995, Kunnasranta 2001, Koskela et al 2002, Kunnasranta et al 2002, Niemi et al 2012, 2013b, Valtonen et al 2012, 2014 and highlight the vulnerability of the population to environmental change. The high re-sighting rates (Table 1) similarly confirm not only the high degree of site fidelity, but may also indicate a small population size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…FCA axis loads of the regional groups differed significantly from each other (MRPP test, P  < 0.001), and all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant ( P  < 0.01 in each case). Microsatellite differentiation was moderate in comparison to estimates based on mitochondrial control-region sequences, which were consistently higher for overall differentiation ( F ST  = 0.390, P  < 0.001 [17]; D est  = 0.256, P  = 0.047) as well as for pairwise F ST values (Table  3). A highly significant negative relationship between relatedness and spatial distance between pairs of individuals was found using both microsatellites ( b  = -0.039, P  < 0.001; Figure  4A) and mtDNA ( b Loiselle  = -0.055; b Nij  = -0.067; both P  < 0.001; Figure  4B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Genetic diversity indices were also calculated across an alternative temporal division scheme, in which individuals were grouped based on their year of birth: 1965–1979 ( N ms  = 14), the 1980s ( N ms  = 54), the 1990s ( N ms  = 47), and the 2000s ( N ms  = 54) (see [17] for details on age determination).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%