2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Baseflow Recession in the Continental United States

Abstract: Baseflow is often treated according to a unique storage‐discharge relationship. However, recent innovations in baseflow recession analysis have allowed novel findings regarding the variability of both the stability of baseflow and its nonlinearity (i.e., the concavity of the hydrograph), as well as the regional clustering of these characteristics. We investigate spatial and temporal patterns in the character of baseflow recession for over 1,000 watersheds in the continental United States. We discover seasonal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beck et al (2013) explained that under these climatic conditions, most of the watershed storage after recharge events was lost to ET due to the high atmospheric demand of water; as a result, baseflow did not vary significantly in response to the storage changes. Recently, Tashie, Pavelsky, and Emanuel (2020) also demonstrated the important role played by ET in affecting the baseflow recession characteristics in the watershed of the United States. Many other studies have also found climate properties such as aridity index, mean annual precipitation, and timing of precipitation to influence the streamflow recession behavior in watersheds (Cooper et al, 2018; Krakauer & Temimi, 2011; Peña‐Arancibia et al, 2010; van Dijk, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beck et al (2013) explained that under these climatic conditions, most of the watershed storage after recharge events was lost to ET due to the high atmospheric demand of water; as a result, baseflow did not vary significantly in response to the storage changes. Recently, Tashie, Pavelsky, and Emanuel (2020) also demonstrated the important role played by ET in affecting the baseflow recession characteristics in the watershed of the United States. Many other studies have also found climate properties such as aridity index, mean annual precipitation, and timing of precipitation to influence the streamflow recession behavior in watersheds (Cooper et al, 2018; Krakauer & Temimi, 2011; Peña‐Arancibia et al, 2010; van Dijk, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recession analysis has been used extensively to quantify the drainage behavior of catchments (Brutsaert & Nieber, 1977; Jachens et al, 2020; Tashie et al, 2020; Roques et al, 2017). It is often assumed that the relationship between the rate of change of streamflow and streamflow follows a power law.…”
Section: Methods and Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the median exponent β m to describe a catchment's average recession behavior. We do not use the parameter α as it is strongly influenced by seasonal variations in catchment wetness and evapotranspiration (e.g., Dralle et al, 2015; Tashie et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methods and Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective hydraulic properties of the aquifer(s) that actually sustain baseflow have long been estimated by watershed hydrologists using hydrograph recession analysis. Here, we briefly summarize the applications of and assumptions underlying traditional hydrograph recession analysis, though we refer readers to the recession literature for a detailed accounting (Brutsaert & Nieber, 1977; Harman & Kim, 2019; Kirchner, 2009; Tallaksen, 1995; Tashie, Pavelsky, & Emanuel, 2020; Troch et al., 2013). We also outline recent reinterpretations of these methods in the following Section 1.1.2, give a more thorough description of the specific methods applied here in Section 2, and describe underlying uncertainties in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the character of baseflow recession (and therefore the properties of the subsurface that are sustaining it) has been shown to vary systematically with antecedent conditions (Biswal & Nagesh Kumar, 2015; Shaw & Riha, 2012; Tashie, Pavelsky, & Emanuel, 2020), recession analysis is better seen as providing a snapshot of the effective hydraulic properties that are instantaneously sustaining baseflow (Tashie, Pavelsky, & Band, 2020). That is, recession analysis effectively integrates the hydraulic properties of only the portions of the watershed that are actively contributing to streamflow processes, which vary with time according to patterns in storage and climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%