2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and Temporal Locomotor Learning in Mouse Cerebellum

Abstract: Highlights d Locomotor learning on a split-belt treadmill is highly conserved across vertebrates d Mice regain gait symmetry by calibrating interlimb coordination in space and time d Locomotor adaptation requires intermediate cerebellum but not cerebral cortex d Circuit mechanisms for spatial and temporal components of learning are dissociable

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
12
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why does spatial gait asymmetry (COO difference), but not temporal gait asymmetry (phasing) explain the faster transfer of step length asymmetry with unilateral stepping? Several studies have suggested that spatial and temporal gait asymmetry are controlled by different processes in the nervous system (Choi et al, 2009;Darmohray et al, 2019;Gonzalez-Rubio et al, 2019;Malone et al, 2012). Temporal gait asymmetry has previously been shown to adapt faster than spatial asymmetry during split-belt treadmill walking (Malone et al, 2012), an observation that our results support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Why does spatial gait asymmetry (COO difference), but not temporal gait asymmetry (phasing) explain the faster transfer of step length asymmetry with unilateral stepping? Several studies have suggested that spatial and temporal gait asymmetry are controlled by different processes in the nervous system (Choi et al, 2009;Darmohray et al, 2019;Gonzalez-Rubio et al, 2019;Malone et al, 2012). Temporal gait asymmetry has previously been shown to adapt faster than spatial asymmetry during split-belt treadmill walking (Malone et al, 2012), an observation that our results support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, it was unexpected to observe significant after-effects in StepTime asymmetry with the motorized shoes. Taken together these findings further support the idea of dissociable neural structures mediating the adaptation of spatial and temporal gait features (Boyd and Winstein, 2004; Darmohray et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We believe that this type of hierarchical organization is not exclusive to explicit control, but it is also applicable to implicit control of the limb in space and time. This is supported by a recent study indicating that lesions to interpose cerebellar nuclei altering the adaptation of double support asymmetry (temporal parameter) also reduced the after-effects of spatial features (Darmohray et al, 2019), whereas the recalibration of spatial features can be halted without modifying the temporal ones (Darmohray et al, 2019). Future studies are needed to determine if similar results would be observed in human bipedal locomotion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is consistent with the idea that the motor system forms internal representations of space (Marigold and Drew, 2017) and time (Avraham et al, 2017; Breska and Ivry, 2018; Drew and Marigold, 2015) for predictive motor control. Several behavioral studies suggest separate recalibration of these internal representations of space and time in locomotion because spatial and timing measures exhibit different adaptation rates in the mature motor system (Malone and Bastian, 2010; Darmohray et al, 2019) throughout development (Vasudevan et al, 2011; Patrick et al, 2014) or healthy aging (Sombric et al, 2017). Spatial and temporal recalibration also have distinct generalization patterns across walking environments (Torres-Oviedo and Bastian, 2010; Mariscal et al, 2018) and most importantly, altering the adaptation of spatial features does not modify the adaptation and recalibration of temporal ones, as shown by us and others (Malone et al, 2012; Long et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%