2014
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0471-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal evolution of distal 10q deletion, a prognostically unfavorable event in diffuse low-grade gliomas

Abstract: BackgroundThe disease course of patients with diffuse low-grade glioma is notoriously unpredictable. Temporal and spatially distinct samples may provide insight into the evolution of clinically relevant copy number aberrations (CNAs). The purpose of this study is to identify CNAs that are indicative of aggressive tumor behavior and can thereby complement the prognostically favorable 1p/19q co-deletion.ResultsGenome-wide, 50 base pair single-end sequencing was performed to detect CNAs in a clinically well-chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison of GNT with diffuse growth patterns with AII, readily available CNA data of 38 AIIs from an low‐grade glioma (LGG) cohort of adults were included. These patients and data have been described before [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison of GNT with diffuse growth patterns with AII, readily available CNA data of 38 AIIs from an low‐grade glioma (LGG) cohort of adults were included. These patients and data have been described before [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In newly diagnosed tumor, analysis of non-representative sample of the tumor (e.g., biopsy in the periphery of the lesion) may omit important pathological and/or molecular features for medical management of the patients. Similarly, temporal heterogeneity supports re-biopsy of recurrent tumor to confirm pathological recurrence/progression and to detect additional molecular alterations helping in prognostic evaluation and therapy decision-making (e.g., druggable abnormalities) [82][83][84].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TCGA level 3 copy number data were publicly available at the time of download and mapped to NCBI36/hg18. These level 3 data involve beginning and end positions of chromosomal segments with deflection values, resulting from TCGA preprocessing (for level definitions and preprocessing see [31]). Segment values were converted to CNA discreet categories by setting thresholds whereby a log2 ratio of >0.20 is gain, < -0.23 is loss and all other values are normal copy number; these values correspond to 30% of the tumor cells with that CNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%