1971
DOI: 10.1016/0002-1571(71)90004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal distribution of solar radiation beneath forest canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
2
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
71
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Este rango es consistente con observaciones hechas en otros estudios, en que la RSG oscilaría entre 1-2 % y 62 % dependiendo de la cubierta forestal, la estructura del bosque, el índice de área foliar, y la estación del año (Reifsnyder et al 1971/1972, Ghuman y Lal 1987, Chen et al 1993, Aussenac 1997, 2000, Carlson y Groot 1997, Davies-Colley et al 2000, Holst y Mayer 2005.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Este rango es consistente con observaciones hechas en otros estudios, en que la RSG oscilaría entre 1-2 % y 62 % dependiendo de la cubierta forestal, la estructura del bosque, el índice de área foliar, y la estación del año (Reifsnyder et al 1971/1972, Ghuman y Lal 1987, Chen et al 1993, Aussenac 1997, 2000, Carlson y Groot 1997, Davies-Colley et al 2000, Holst y Mayer 2005.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The number of randomly positioned sensors required for canopy-level estimation depends on the precision required. Reifsnyder et al (1971) found coefficients of variation (CV) of 121% for pine and 225% for hardwood values for each sensor averaged over a 5-min period. If averaged over the entire day, however, the CV dropped to 43 and 13.5%, respectively, indicating that fewer sensors are needed to characterize light over days or seasons.…”
Section: Continuous Seasonal Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reifsnyder et al (1971) also noted that on overcast days, fewer sensors are needed to characterize light with the same level of precision as on sunny days. In theory, at high latitudes with their lower solar angles, the probability of penetration of the canopy by direct-beam light may be lower than the average penetration of diffuse light.…”
Section: Measurements On Overcast Daysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light penetration depends on the intensity of incident light and upon the number, size, as well as the spatial distribution of canopy openings (Anderson 1964, Reifsnyder et al 1971, Hutchinson & Matt 1977, Brokaw 1985, Brokaw & Busing 2000. Crown traits such as leaf area determine the carbon gain of the whole plant, in interaction with light levels received by leaves and the ability to convert light to plant assimilates.…”
Section: Gaps and Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique involves taking photographs looking upward from beneath a canopy through a 1800 lens, which permits direct measurement of canopy openings and estimation of light transmittance. Light penetration through the canopy depends on the intensity of incident light and upon the number, size, and spatial distribution of canopy openings (Anderson 1964, Reifsnyder et al 1971, Hutchinson & Matt 1977, Brokaw 1985, Brokaw & Busing 2000. Consequently, hemispherical canopy photographs can be used to quantify both the status of the canopy and light levels for a particular understory location.…”
Section: Measurement Of Canopy Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%