Spatial and temporal clustering of isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate in Poland

Materna‐Kiryluk, Anna; Więckowska, Barbara; Wiśniewska, Katarzyna; Czyżewska, Małgorzata; Godula‐Stuglik, Urszula; Jaworska-Bobkier, Romana; Walencka, Zofia; Kucharska, Zofia; Latos‐Bieleńska, Anna

doi:10.1080/09603123.2014.883593

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To provide additional protection against this type of bias, we reanalyzed the data using conditional logistic regression after 1:1 case–control matching based on confounding characteristics and did not observe any significant differences in the estimates of risk, further strengthening our internal validity. Lower education and rural residence at birth have also been associated with clefts in other studies (Messer et al, ; Lin et al, ; Materna‐Kiryluk et al, ). Second, even though we found no appreciable differences in our estimates of risk for any cleft type versus cleft lip with or without cleft palate, our limited sample size did not permit us to examine risk estimates for isolated cleft palate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Parental risk factors for oral clefts among Central Africans, Southeast Asians, and Central Americans

Figueiredo

Magee

et al. 2015

Birth Defects Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSeveral lifestyle and environmental exposures have been suspected as risk factors for oral clefts, although few have been convincingly demonstrated. Studies across global diverse populations could offer additional insight given varying types and levels of exposures.MethodsWe performed an international case–control study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (133 cases, 301 controls), Vietnam (75 cases, 158 controls), the Philippines (102 cases, 152 controls), and Honduras (120 cases, 143 controls). Mothers were recruited from hospitals and their exposures were collected from interviewer‐administered questionnaires. We used logistic regression modeling to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsFamily history of clefts was strongly associated with increased risk (maternal: OR = 4.7; 95% CI, 3.0–7.2; paternal: OR = 10.5; 95% CI, 5.9–18.8; siblings: OR = 5.3; 95% CI, 1.4–19.9). Advanced maternal age (5 year OR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0–1.3), pregestational hypertension (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3–5.1), and gestational seizures (OR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1–7.4) were statistically significant risk factors. Lower maternal (secondary school OR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2–2.2; primary school OR = 2.4, 95% CI, 1.6–2.8) and paternal education (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4–2.5; and OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1–2.9, respectively) and paternal tobacco smoking (OR = 1.5, 95% CI, 1.1–1.9) were associated with an increased risk. No other significant associations between maternal and paternal factors were found; some environmental factors including rural residency, indoor cooking with wood, chemicals and water source appeared to be associated with an increased risk in adjusted models.ConclusionOur study represents one of the first international studies investigating risk factors for clefts among multiethnic underserved populations. Our findings suggest a multifactorial etiology including both maternal and paternal factors. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 103:863–879, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Parental risk factors for oral clefts among Central Africans, Southeast Asians, and Central Americans

Figueiredo

Magee

et al. 2015

Birth Defects Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rural-urban differences have been reported for many health and birth outcomes, 7 but few studies have investigated the relationship between rural maternal residence and OFC risk. [8][9][10][11][12][13] In all but one of these studies, infant OFC risk was higher for rural than for urban resident mothers. 12 Orofacial clefts risk has been reported to vary by race/ethnicity strongly enough to garner recommendations for studying aetiology separately for different racial/ethnic groups.…”

Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk of non‐syndromic orofacial clefts by maternal rural‐urban residence and race/ethnicity: A population‐based case‐control study in Washington State 1989‐2014

Kapos

White

Schmidt

et al. 2020

Paediatric Perinatal Epid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Only one study included data from Oklahoma, though it did not provide a detailed comparison of anomalies by race/ethnicity for Oklahoma children (Mai et al, ). Studies have identified spatial clusters of oral clefts in Texas (Cech, Burau, & Walston, ) and Poland (Materna‐Kiryluk et al, ); congenital heart defects in Wisconsin (Cronk, Gangnon, Cossette, McElroy, & Pelech, ), Maryland/District of Columbia (Kuehl & Loffredo, ), and China (Ma et al, ); and neural tube defects in China (Liao et al, ; Liao, Wang, Li, Guo, & Zheng, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distribution of congenital anomalies by race/ethnicity and geospatial location in Oklahoma, 1997–2009

Janitz

Dao

Campbell

et al. 2019

Birth Defects Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Congenital anomalies were the leading cause of infant mortality, responsible for 23 and 21% of deaths in Oklahoma and the USA, respectively, in 2016. We aimed to determine the prevalence by race/ethnicity and spatial distribution of congenital anomalies to identify geographic and racial/ethnic disparities, particularly among American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN). Methods: We evaluated the prevalence of anomalies by type and race/ethnicity among 648,074 live births in Oklahoma from 1997 to 2009. Prevalence proportion ratios (PPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Poisson regression. We used Moran's I and Getis-Ord Gi* to evaluate spatial clustering for neural tube defects, critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs), and oral clefts among births whose residence geocoded to the ZIP code or finer level.Results: Overall prevalence of anomalies among live births was 3.9%. Non-Hispanic (NH) African American (PPR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.91), Asian/Pacific Islander (PPR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.78), and Hispanic (PPR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.91) children had a lower prevalence of anomalies compared to NH whites. The prevalence in NH AI/AN children was similar to NH whites (PPR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.05). However, differences in specific types of anomalies were observed by race/ethnicity. We observed no spatial autocorrelation for CCHD and oral clefts. Neural tube defects demonstrated spatial autocorrelation (p < .0001). Local hot spots varied by anomaly. Discussion: The prevalence of anomalies by race/ethnicity and geography differed by race/ethnicity and region, though this varied by anomaly. Additional research is needed to identify behavioral or environmental factors to target for prevention. K E Y W O R D SAmerican Indian/Alaska Native, congenital anomalies, prevalence, race/ethnicity, spatial analysis

show abstract

Spatial and temporal clustering of isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate in Poland

Cited by 7 publications

References 24 publications

Parental risk factors for oral clefts among Central Africans, Southeast Asians, and Central Americans

Parental risk factors for oral clefts among Central Africans, Southeast Asians, and Central Americans

Risk of non‐syndromic orofacial clefts by maternal rural‐urban residence and race/ethnicity: A population‐based case‐control study in Washington State 1989‐2014

Distribution of congenital anomalies by race/ethnicity and geospatial location in Oklahoma, 1997–2009

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About