2018
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal changes in species composition of submersed aquatic vegetation reveal effects of river restoration

Abstract: We examined temporal changes in spatial patterns of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) in response to the restoration of geomorphic habitat in Navigation Pool 8 of the Upper Mississippi River from 1998 to 2016. The frequency of occurrence and species composition of SAV at sampling sites were spatially interpolated for each year to create annual maps. Linear models were fitted to temporal changes in SAV within each map pixel. The frequency of occurrence of SAV (across all species) increased over time in much of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the environmental niche space and biotic interactions in rivers may lend to structuring riverine macrophytes into discernable vegetation types. Strong habitat gradients in rivers (e.g., sharp changes in water depth and velocity over small spatial scales) create ecological boundaries that can invoke macrophyte responses (Bouska et al, 2022; Carhart & De Jager, 2019). Macrophyte assembly also may be influenced by biotic interactions like facilitation or competition (LeBagousse‐Pinguet et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the environmental niche space and biotic interactions in rivers may lend to structuring riverine macrophytes into discernable vegetation types. Strong habitat gradients in rivers (e.g., sharp changes in water depth and velocity over small spatial scales) create ecological boundaries that can invoke macrophyte responses (Bouska et al, 2022; Carhart & De Jager, 2019). Macrophyte assembly also may be influenced by biotic interactions like facilitation or competition (LeBagousse‐Pinguet et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study in the UMR focused on (1) classifying macrophyte vegetation types within multiple study areas, strata, and two phases spanning early and late macrophyte recoveries, (2) identifying indicator species, species abundances, and diversity indices that characterize the vegetation types, and (3) relating the environmental gradients that likely structured the vegetation types during recovery, such as inundation regime, localized habitat, and regional water quality. Hypothesis 1 was that different vegetation types would be distinguishable at two spatial scales: (1) “study areas” (each averaging ~40 km in length) due to slightly different regional species composition and temporal trajectories of species turnover (Bouska et al, 2022), and (2) “strata” (each averaging ~4–15 km length; strata are called floodplain lakes, side channels, and impounded areas) due to strong differences in environmental conditions and disturbance frequency that would reflect lotic and lentic plant assemblages (Carhart & De Jager, 2019). Hypothesis 2 was that the early phase would have few vegetation types, whereas the late phase would have more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%