2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00435-019-00470-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal changes in buccal pressure during prey-capture in the trumpetfish (Aulostomus maculatus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While frogfish rely on extremely large rotation of the cranial-most intervertebral joints ( figure 4 ), in other species with large and fast cranial elevation the first 1–4 vertebrae are actually fused to the neurocranium, e.g. Luciocephalus pulcher [ 28 ] and Aulostomus maculatus [ 29 ]. One function of these fused vertebrae may be to resist the high forces resulting from epaxial muscles acting on the neurocranium during powerful cranial elevation, while dorsoventral rotation occurs over more caudal joints .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While frogfish rely on extremely large rotation of the cranial-most intervertebral joints ( figure 4 ), in other species with large and fast cranial elevation the first 1–4 vertebrae are actually fused to the neurocranium, e.g. Luciocephalus pulcher [ 28 ] and Aulostomus maculatus [ 29 ]. One function of these fused vertebrae may be to resist the high forces resulting from epaxial muscles acting on the neurocranium during powerful cranial elevation, while dorsoventral rotation occurs over more caudal joints .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sphyraena barracuda (TL = 4.50 and positive PC1 axis) is a large predator that has a strong bite and uses the rapid acceleration of its body to capture its prey (Grubich et al ., 2008). Similar behaviour has been observed in hunting and capture tactics in trumpetfish (order Syngnathiformes, TL = 4.43–4.50) (Auster, 2008; Tegge et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intraoral pressure cannula only provides pressure readings at one location within the buccal cavity and does not capture variations in pressure during suction feeding (Muller et al, 1982; Van Wassenbergh, 2015). These estimates are likely underestimates of subambient pressure, since modeling of clariid catfishes and bluegill sunfish (Van Wassenbergh et al, 2015) and in vivo measurements (Tegge et al, 2020) suggested that highest subambient pressure occurred more caudally in the buccal cavity (Van Wassenbergh et al, 2005; Van Wassenbergh et al, 2006b). Additionally, our power calculations do not account for the forces required to overcome inertia or drag (Van Wassenbergh et al, 2015), yet studies of clariid catfishes and largemouth bass indicate that these forces are likely small compared to that required to overcome subambient pressure (Van Wassenbergh et al, 2005; Van Wassenbergh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intraoral pressure cannula only provides pressure readings at one location within the buccal cavity and does not capture variations in pressure during suction feeding (Muller et al, 1982;Van Wassenbergh, 2015). These estimates are likely underestimates of subambient pressure, since modeling of clariid catfishes and bluegill sunfish (Van Wassenbergh et al, 2015) and in vivo measurements (Tegge et al, 2020) suggested that highest subambient pressure occurred more caudally in the buccal cavity (Van Wassenbergh et al, 2005;Van Wassenbergh et al, 2006).…”
Section: Power Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%