2020
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-38-149-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and seasonal effects on the delayed ionospheric response to solar EUV changes

Abstract: This study correlates different ionospheric parameters with the integrated solar extreme ultraviolet radiation (EUV) radiation to analyze the delayed ionospheric response, testing and improving upon previous studies on the ionospheric delay. Several time series of correlation coefficients and delays are presented to characterize the trend of the ionospheric delay from January 2011 to December 2013. The impact of the diurnal variations of ionospheric parameters in the analysis at an hourly resolution for fixed … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(59 reference statements)
9
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Q EUV and corresponding TEC are in good agreement (correlation coefficient of 0.69). The estimated delays based on Q EUV and TEC are similar to the results of studies using actual EUV measurements and TEC, for example, Schmölter et al (2020) 3. N Max and corresponding TEC are in good agreement (correlation coefficient of 0.59).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Q EUV and corresponding TEC are in good agreement (correlation coefficient of 0.69). The estimated delays based on Q EUV and TEC are similar to the results of studies using actual EUV measurements and TEC, for example, Schmölter et al (2020) 3. N Max and corresponding TEC are in good agreement (correlation coefficient of 0.59).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Past studies on the effect of solar radiation variations at different timescales have been based on the total electron content (TEC, frequently given in TECU; 1 TECU= 10 16 electrons m −2 ), peak electron density (NmF2, cm −3 ), and the corresponding height (HmF2, km) (e.g., Jakowski et al, 1991;Afraimovich et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2012; Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. et al, 2016;Schmölter et al, , 2020Vaishnav et al, 2018Vaishnav et al, , 2019Ren et al, 2018, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a more precise and higher temporal resolution solar flux, an ionospheric delay of about 17-19 h has been reported by . The spatial and seasonal effects on the ionospheric delay have been further investigated in detail by Schmölter et al (2020) using European and Australian locations. Their study highlighted the role of geomagnetic activity in the ionospheric delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the ionospheric delay, different ionospheric parameters have been considered using daily resolution data, an ionospheric delay of about 1-2 d against solar proxies has been reported (Jakowski et al, 1991;Jacobi et al, 2016;Vaishnav et al, 2019). Only recently, Schmölter et al (2020) used SDO EVE and GOES EUV fluxes to calculate the ionospheric delay of about 17 h as a mean value based on hourly time resolution data. This observed delay was also confirmed by numerical physics based models (Ren et al, 2018;Vaishnav et al, 2018).…”
Section: Cross Correlation and Delay Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profiles of the delayed ionospheric response dependent on latitude have been calculated in previous studies (Lee et al, 2012;Ren et al, 2018) and the influence of seasonal variations and geomagnetic activity on both hemispheres has also been characterized (Schmölter et al, 2020). The complexity of the seasonal variations and associated anomalies has been investigated in other studies for ionospheric parameters like TEC (Romero-Hernandez et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%