Spatial and seasonal distribution of Arctic aerosols observed by CALIOP (2006–2012)

Abstract

We use retrievals of aerosol extinction from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) on board the CALIPSO satellite to examine the vertical, horizontal and temporal variability of tropospheric Arctic aerosols during 2006–2012. We develop an empirical method that takes into account the difference in sensitivity between daytime and nighttime retrievals over the Arctic. Comparisons of the retrieved aerosol extinction to in situ measurements at Barrow (Alaska) and Alert (Canada) show that CALIOP reproduces the observed seasonal cycle and magnitude of surface aerosols to within 25%. In the free troposphere, we find that daytime CALIOP retrievals will only detect the strongest aerosol haze events as demonstrated by a comparison to aircraft measurements obtained during NASA's ARCTAS mission during April 2008. This leads to a systematic underestimate of the column aerosol optical depth by a factor of 2–10. However, when the CALIOP sensitivity threshold is applied to aircraft observations, we find that CALIOP reproduces in situ observations to within 20% and captures the vertical profile of extinction over the Alaskan Arctic. Comparisons with the ground-based HSRL Lidar at Eureka, Canada, show that CALIOP and HSRL capture the evolution of the aerosol backscatter vertical distribution from winter to spring, but a quantitative comparison is inconclusive as the retrieved HSRL backscatter appears to overestimate in situ observations factor of 2 at all altitudes. In the High Arctic (> 70° N) near the surface (< 2 km), CALIOP aerosol extinctions reach a maximum in December-March (10–20 Mm<sup>−1</sup>), followed by a sharp decline and a minimum in May–September (1–4 Mm<sup>−1</sup>), thus providing the first Pan-Arctic view of Arctic Haze seasonality. The European and Asian Arctic sectors display the highest wintertime extinctions, while the Atlantic sector is the cleanest. Over the Low Arctic (60–70° N) near the surface, CALIOP extinctions reach a maximum over land in summer due to boreal forest fires. During summer, we find that smoke aerosols reach higher altitudes (up to 4 km) over Eastern Siberia and North America than over Northern Eurasia, where it remains mostly confined below 2 km. In the free troposphere, the extinction maximum over the Arctic occurs in March–April at 2–5 km altitude and April–May at 5–8 km. This is consistent with transport from the mid-latitudes associated with the annual maximum in cyclonic activity and blocking patterns in the Northern Hemisphere. A strong gradient in aerosol extinction is observed between 60° N and 70° N in the summer. This is likely due to efficient stratocumulus wet scavenging at high latitudes combined with the poleward retreat of the polar front. Interannual variability in the middle and upper troposphere is associated with biomass burning events (high extinctions observed by CALIOP in spring 2008 and summer 2010) and volcanic eruptions (Kasatochi in...

Long‐Term Trends for Marine Sulfur Aerosol in the Alaskan Arctic and Relationships With Temperature

“…The composition and effects of aerosol are extremely important to understand in the Arctic, which is warming faster than any other region of the world (Stocker, 2014). Long‐range transport from lower latitudes can be an important source of aerosol; however, in the summertime wet removal results in less efficient transport of aerosol, meaning that the Arctic atmosphere can be characterized as relatively clean near the surface (Croft et al, 2016; Di Pierro et al, 2013; Polissar et al, 1999). In periods with no influence from transport, aerosol numbers are strongly influenced by new particle formation and growth (NPF/G), which has been shown to control the concentration of CCN in the Arctic (Croft et al, 2016; Heintzenberg et al, 2017; Köllner et al, 2017; Leaitch et al, 2013; Willis et al, 2017).…”

Evaluation of the aerosol vertical distribution in global aerosol models through comparison against CALIOP measurements: AeroCom phase II results

“…However, significant progress in characterizing the tropospheric aerosol vertical distribution has been made in the recent years through the use of ground‐ and satellite‐based lidar measurements, especially those from the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite that has been acquiring cloud and aerosol backscattering data since mid‐June 2006 [ Winker et al , ]. The CALIOP Level 2 Layer 5 km product [ Liu et al , , ; Omar et al , ; Vaughan et al , , ] has been used in previous studies to assess the 3‐D distribution of tropospheric aerosols from regional to global scales [e.g., Yu et al , ; Koffi et al , ; Sheridan et al , ; Di Pierro et al , ; Winker et al , ; Prijith et al , ]. Despite several limitations (see, for instance, Koffi et al [], Winker et al [ ], Young et al [], and Kim et al []), the version 3.01 product [e.g., Hu et al , ; Liu et al , ; Vaughan et al , ] was shown to provide a realistic and representative description of the mean regional vertical distributions and seasonal variations of aerosol extinctions, over source and downwind regions.…”

Discriminating Between Clouds and Aerosols in the CALIOP Version 4.1 Data Products

“…Verzella, 2008). Pollution and dust from Asian sources can reach the Arctic in 3 to 5 days, carried by mid-latitude cyclones (Di Pierro et al, 2011;Di Pierro et al, 2013;. In the earlier CALIOP data product releases, dust layers over the Arctic could be misclassified by the CAD algorithm as ice clouds (Di Pierro et al, 2011).…”