2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and model-order based reactor signal analysis methodology for BWR core stability evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second data set to be analyzed in this paper corresponds to low power (18.8%) and low coolant ow rate (33.5%) conditions, during the generator synchronization of the KKL core. The systematic analysis of the plant data by using the PSI stability methodology 22 (not shown here), revealed high decay ratios (i.e., DR = 0.6 -0.9) at the very low resonance frequency of 0.27 Hz for most of the in-core neutron detectors. It is well known in stability analysis, however, that at such low core power/ ow levels, the reactor core is expected to be very stable, and therefore, the source of such high decay ratios is intended to be estimated via connectivity analysis.…”
Section: B High Decay Ratio During Start-up Of Kkl Cycle 33mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second data set to be analyzed in this paper corresponds to low power (18.8%) and low coolant ow rate (33.5%) conditions, during the generator synchronization of the KKL core. The systematic analysis of the plant data by using the PSI stability methodology 22 (not shown here), revealed high decay ratios (i.e., DR = 0.6 -0.9) at the very low resonance frequency of 0.27 Hz for most of the in-core neutron detectors. It is well known in stability analysis, however, that at such low core power/ ow levels, the reactor core is expected to be very stable, and therefore, the source of such high decay ratios is intended to be estimated via connectivity analysis.…”
Section: B High Decay Ratio During Start-up Of Kkl Cycle 33mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is well known in stability analysis, however, that at such low core power/ ow levels, the reactor core is expected to be very stable, and therefore, the source of such high decay ratios is intended to be estimated via connectivity analysis. The extended statistical and postprocessing analysis of the measured data in both the time domain and the frequency domain, which is based on the consolidated PSI methodology, 22 revealed which signals are exhibiting a distinct oscillatory behavior during this measurement. Figure 9 presents the time-and frequency-dependent behavior of these reac- For this example, the model order is estimated by the Bayesian information criterion as p = 6, and then a MVAR( 6) is tted to the measured data.…”
Section: B High Decay Ratio During Start-up Of Kkl Cycle 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were evaluated using time-series-analysis methodology developed over the years at Paul Scherrer Institute, using HPTSAC code, based on the combination of Akaike information criterion, Minimum description length principle, and the plateau method (Dokhane et al, 2006). According to the HPT-SAC estimations, the dynamics of the objective processes are well represented by VARMA(4,3) model.…”
Section: Application Of Csarma For Causality Analysis Of Kkl Plant Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the core stability properties, system identification methods based on univariate Autoregressive Moving-Average (ARMA) modeling of neutron flux signals are usually applied (Rotander et al, 1999). This is for instance the case in the PSI methodology developed over the years for applications to the Swiss reactors (Dokhane et al, 2006). Typically, the ARMA models are estimated based on the assumption that process noise (e.g., pressure and temperatures) excites the core dynamics and that the driving noise is white.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nonparametric methods, DR is evaluated from the autocorrelation function of the signal. For parametric methods, it is evaluated from the impulse response of the system or from its effective transfer function [17]. Different parametric models are actually used, being that the autoregressive moving average (ARMA), the autoregressive (AR) or the moving-average (MA) are the most common ones.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%