2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2004.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and inter-annual variability of the macrobenthic communities within a coastal lagoon (Óbidos lagoon) and its relationship with environmental parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the observations of several authors (Carvalho et al, 2005;Moreira et al, 2006;Lourido et al, 2008), who report that subsurface deposit feeders are predominantly found in sandy and muddy sediments. According to these authors, the distribution and abundance of these burrowing species is controlled by nutrients in the water column.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with the observations of several authors (Carvalho et al, 2005;Moreira et al, 2006;Lourido et al, 2008), who report that subsurface deposit feeders are predominantly found in sandy and muddy sediments. According to these authors, the distribution and abundance of these burrowing species is controlled by nutrients in the water column.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Mikac & Musco, 2010). As most of the environmental parameters are closely related to each other, it is difficult to separate the effect of any given parameter on the spatial distribution of polychaete communities (Carvalho et al, 2005). Nevertheless, it is generally observed that, although some taxa are associated with a given sediment-type habitat, their distribution is rarely restricted to that habitat alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the laboratory, the presence of vegetation in each sample was noted and the benthic fauna was sorted, identified to species level (where possible), and classified to at least one of the following trophic groups according to the nature and origin of food: 1) herbivores (H), feeding on macroalgae and/or phanerogams; 2) carnivores (C), feeding on various sessile or motile invertebrates; 3) suspension feeders (Sf), feeding on suspended organic particles in the water column; 4) deposit feeders (Df), feeding on detritus on the substratum at the bottom of the lagoon. Species belonging to more than one trophic group were assigned by dividing the number of their individuals by the number of trophic groups in which they could be included (Fauchald and Jumars 1979, Boaventura et al 1999, Cancela da Fonseca et al 2001, Bazairi et al 2003, Carvalho et al 2005. The assignment of each taxon to the appropriate trophic group was performed according to Fauchald and Jumars (1979), Webb et al (1987), Koutsoubas et al (2000b), Mistri et al(2001a), Kelly et al (2002), Fidalgo e Costa et al Grain size analysis of the sediment was carried out according to the methods described by Buchanan (1984).…”
Section: Sampling Methods and Laboratory Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These environmental conditions favour a high species diversity (Carvalho et al 2005, Koutsoubas et al 2000, with molluscs often described as the most diverse faunal group in the sea inlet of marine lagoons (Millet and Guelorget 1994). This finding is in agreement with the high number of species observed within the Channel Cluster (S5-S8), considering that this very tiny spot (0.27 km 2 ) hosted 113 taxa, and 82 were only recorded within it (Table 3).…”
Section: Current Molluscan Assemblage: Faunal and Ecological Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%