Spatial accessibility to health facilities in Sub-Saharan Africa: comparing existing models with survey-based perceived accessibility

Abstract

Background Mapping geographical accessibility to health services is essential to improve access to public health in sub-Saharan Africa. Different methods exist to estimate geographical accessibility, but little is known about the ability of these methods to represent the experienced accessibility of the population, and about the added-value of sophisticated and data-demanding methods over simpler ones. Here we compare the most commonly used methods to survey-based perceived accessibility in different geographical settings. Methods Modelled accessibility maps are computed for 12 selected sub-Saharan African countries using four methods: Euclidean distance, cost-distance considering walking and motorized speed, and Kernel density. All methods are based on open and large-scale datasets to allow replication. Correlation coefficients are computed between the four modelled accessibility indexes and the perceived accessibility index extracted from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), and compared across different socio-geographical contexts (rural and urban, population with or without access to motorized transports, per country). Results Our analysis suggests that, at medium spatial resolution and using globally-consistent input datasets, the use of sophisticated and data-demanding methods is difficult to justify as their added value over a simple Euclidian distance method is not clear. We also highlight that all modelled accessibilities are better correlated with perceived accessibility in rural than urban contexts and for population who do not have access to motorized transportation. Conclusions This paper should guide researchers in the public health domain for knowing strengths and limits of different methods to evaluate disparities in health services accessibility. We suggest that using cost-distance accessibility maps over Euclidean distance is not always relevant, especially when based on low resolution and/or non-exhaustive geographical datasets, which is often the case in low- and middle-income countries.

Spatial inequality in the accessibility of healthcare services in the Philippines

“…First, the measurement of impedance between supply and demand locations was based on a straight-line distance instead of roadnetwork distance or travel time. However, previous studies (Apparicio et al, 2017;Bihin et al, 2022) have shown a strong correlation between Euclidean distance and network distance, implying that Euclidean distance can serve as suitable alternative when network distance or travel time calculations are complex. Second, the choice of catchment size and distance decay function in this study was arbitrary, although it was aligned with previous studies.…”

Evaluation of the spatial equality of the medical service function from the perspective of the life circle：A case study of Chengdu City

“…In terms of setting the scope for public services and the process for determining the scope of the livable life circle, existing studies for research purposes have adopted 15 minutes as the boundary limit for the travel time to the facilities. For example, Han studied the spatial differentiation of service facilities for communities in the Shaha district of Dalian within 15 minutes [13], and Wei studied the spatial optimization strategy for accessing public service facilities in Wuhan also for a 15-minute travel period in the context of matching supply and demand. In practice, since the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Wuhan and other cities have adopted the 15-minute community life circle time as a key criterion in urban governance as has been reflected in the special meeting concerned with spatial planning at the national level [14].…”