Spatial Accessibility of Multiple Facilities for Affordable Housing Neighborhoods in Harbin, China

Abstract

The spatial mismatch between affordable housing neighborhoods and public services/facilities significantly reduces the well-being of low-income dwellers, which has risen to a typical issue of spatial injustice. Previous studies on accessibility evaluation most focus on a single type of service, lacking empirical studies exploring the integrated spatial accessibility of multiple services for low-income residents. Taking Harbin City in northeast China as an example, this study assessed the spatial accessibility of transit, education, healthcare, shopping, and recreation facilities for affordable housing neighborhoods, using the Gaussian-based 2SFCA method. The pattern of accessibility for each type of facility in Harbin showed obvious spatial differentiation between the urban core and the city periphery, for both affordable housing neighborhoods and other neighborhoods. The sample household survey indicated that low-income households who were generally characterized as elderly, less-educated, under-employed or unemployed had extremely restricted and passive residence choices. In comparison to non-low-income households, the spatial accessibility of higher-level facilities for low-income households was relatively poorer. Particularly, affordable housing neighborhoods had much lower accessibility of subway stations, though more than 97% of low-income respondents living in affordable housing neighborhoods chose to solve the daily trip demand by taking a bus or the subway. With respect to equity-oriented urban planning, more importance should be attached to the spatial accessibility of public services and facilities when planning affordable housing projects for low-income households.

The role of vertical segregation in urban social processes

“…Moreover, a special issue of the journal Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique-Moderne et Contemporain discusses different forms of micro-segregation in Naples 12,44 , Venice 45 and Athens [46][47][48] , and a special issue on urban micro-segregation in Land (https://www.mdpi. com/journal/land/special_issues/938S2A99L1) discusses this issue in Paris and Malmö 49 , Naples 19 , Fuzhou 50 , Szeged 51 and Rome 52 .…”

Assessing the Spatial Accessibility of Urban Medical Facilities in Multi-Level and Multi-Period Scales Based on Web Mapping API and an Improved Potential Model

“…According to China's "Third-level Hospital Evaluation Standards (2020 Edition)" [59], this study classified hospitals into to three levels: tertiary hospitals, secondary hospitals, and primary hospitals. Referring to the weight assignments for hospitals of different levels in previous studies [60,61], this study determined that the weight values of tertiary, secondary, and primary hospitals were 60, 30, and 10, respectively. The comprehensive hospital accessibility assessment model based on the improved potential model used in this study is as follows:…”