2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90132-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spasticity in spinal cord injury: Self- and clinically rated intrinsic fluctuations and intervention-induced changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The VAS is a valid and reliable measure in rating pain intensity and is presently being used more often for the assessment of spasticity. 11,13 The level of spasticityrelated discomfort was scored using the Borg scale. The Borg scale is a widely used scale for perceived exertion in exercise, 15,16 but is new in this field.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VAS is a valid and reliable measure in rating pain intensity and is presently being used more often for the assessment of spasticity. 11,13 The level of spasticityrelated discomfort was scored using the Borg scale. The Borg scale is a widely used scale for perceived exertion in exercise, 15,16 but is new in this field.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients' evaluation of spasticity is often an ad hoc report and is rarely documented by using measurement tools like the spasm frequency scale or a visual analog scale (VAS). [11][12][13] Usually no differentiation is made between the perceived degree of spasticity and the experienced spasticity-related level of discomfort. Figure 1 shows a proposed basic model, showing the interrelationship between the different components of the ICF framework and the perception of the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Although MAS is the most commonly used tool for measuring spasticity in clinical practice and research, the reliability and validity of this scale remain unclear. 27,28 Moreover, the degree of spasticity can vary according to the patient's physical and emotional conditions, even within a single day. 28 Therefore, to separate the two groups (no or mild spasticity group vs severe spasticity group) clearly, we excluded six subjects with moderate spasticity from the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Moreover, the degree of spasticity can vary according to the patient's physical and emotional conditions, even within a single day. 28 Therefore, to separate the two groups (no or mild spasticity group vs severe spasticity group) clearly, we excluded six subjects with moderate spasticity from the analysis. In addition, to ensure an accurate assessment of the differences between the groups, we evaluated the SCATS and the PSFS scores, as well as the MAS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Spasticity was evaluated by the same investigator while the patient was in a supine position using standard procedures. 13 Room temperature was maintained constant between 21 and 24 1C. Three scores were reported for each specific muscle group and were then averaged (Table 1).…”
Section: First Visitmentioning
confidence: 99%