2009
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508101747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spasticity, an impairment that is poorly defined and poorly measured

Abstract: The term spasticity is inconsistently defined and this inconsistency will need to be resolved. Often, the measures used did not correspond to the clinical features of spasticity that were defined within a paper (i.e. internal validity was compromised). There is need to ensure that this lack of congruence is addressed in future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
152
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
152
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 A positive correlation has been reported between the Ashworth scale and indices of clonus and spasm, 37 therefore the negative correlation between MAS and the injury duration observed in this study suggest that the frequency of involuntary muscle contraction because of spasm gradually decreases over time after SCI. In evaluating the extent of spasticity over time, we found no statistically significant correlation between the stretch reflex gain and offset in the lower muscles (MG, Sol) and injury duration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…35,36 A positive correlation has been reported between the Ashworth scale and indices of clonus and spasm, 37 therefore the negative correlation between MAS and the injury duration observed in this study suggest that the frequency of involuntary muscle contraction because of spasm gradually decreases over time after SCI. In evaluating the extent of spasticity over time, we found no statistically significant correlation between the stretch reflex gain and offset in the lower muscles (MG, Sol) and injury duration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Indeed, this situation is not uncommon in health-care research. Lack of standardised definitions for key terms and outcomes is noted in studies of whiplash-associated disorders [57], drowning [75], falls [41], spasticity [65], peptic ulcers [103] and schizophrenia [58]. This finding is likely due to the lack of a standardised measure for recovery as well as the absence of a clear and agreed-upon definition of what recovery from LBP means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 An often used definition of spasticity is the one by Lance: 4 'a motor disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in the tonic stretch reflex with exaggerated tendon jerks, resulting from hyper excitability of the stretch reflex, as one component of the upper motor-neuron syndrome'. This definition has the benefit of being precise but has been challenged 5 and does not reflect the multidimensional nature of spasticity. For the purpose of this study, we used a relatively broader definition developed by the SPASM consortium: 6 'Disordered sensory-motor control resulting from an upper motor-neuron lesion presenting intermittent or sustained involuntary activity of muscles'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%