2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPASM: A 3D-ASM for segmentation of sparse and arbitrarily oriented cardiac MRI data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
105
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A 4D probabilistic atlas of the heart and 3D intensity template was used in Lorenzo-Valdes et al [19] to localize the LV. Many other methods have been proposed that segment the LV from short-axis images [20][21][22], multiple views [23,24], and using registration information [25,26]. Paragios [21] uses prior shape information in an active contour framework for segmenting the LV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 4D probabilistic atlas of the heart and 3D intensity template was used in Lorenzo-Valdes et al [19] to localize the LV. Many other methods have been proposed that segment the LV from short-axis images [20][21][22], multiple views [23,24], and using registration information [25,26]. Paragios [21] uses prior shape information in an active contour framework for segmenting the LV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that SA initialization was robust to slices misregistration, since possible initialization inaccuracies were compensated by the rigid deformation. Producing a mean positioning error inferior to one pixel for both SA and LA images, comparable with inter-expert drawing variability [11], the method proved accurate and robust. We validated the method for ED phase only, since the segmentation of the whole cardiac cycle can be then obtained using automatic contour propagation [22], shown to preserve its accuracy within acceptable ranges while being much faster than phase-by-phase segmentation.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many publications propose automatic or semi-automatic methods for segmenting the LV in SA CMR images [4][5][6][7][8] or in multiple views [9][10][11], to mention a few. Since SA CMR images, acquired over multiple breath-holds, are often misregistered due to patient motion or inconsistent respiration, 3D segmentation and analysis methods require a registration preprocessing step [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of techniques described in the literature in this context are based on the use of image intensity gradients, and thus may not necessarily be ideally suited for CMR images, because gradients in these images may not be strong enough to allow accurate endocardial border detection and because the algorithms may be dependent on image quality and the specific pulse sequence used for imaging (23). There are different types of algorithms for boundary detection from CMR images, including approaches based on deformable models (24,25), active shape models (26,27), active appearance models (28,29), and expectation maximization method (30). However, these methods usually require extensive manual tracing for building the model database or for the definition of the training set, thus limiting their clinical application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%