1969
DOI: 10.2307/2258222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spartina Maritima (Curtis) Fernald

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Juncaceae pollen does not preserve well and might be destroyed by acidic treatment (Deng et al, 2006), and plants from the genus Spartina might be reproducing mainly by asexual propagation (Marchant and Goodman, 1969). Therefore, high marsh sediments colonized by Juncus maritimus and Spartina patens are expected to have a lower local pollen representation.…”
Section: Local Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Juncaceae pollen does not preserve well and might be destroyed by acidic treatment (Deng et al, 2006), and plants from the genus Spartina might be reproducing mainly by asexual propagation (Marchant and Goodman, 1969). Therefore, high marsh sediments colonized by Juncus maritimus and Spartina patens are expected to have a lower local pollen representation.…”
Section: Local Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recession of S. maritima in its northern range limit (southern England and Brittany) is interpreted as a consequence of climatic changes and anthropogenic habitat disturbance (Raybould et al, 1991), but may also be related to the biological and morphological differences between these two species. Spartina alterniflora exhibits strong rhizomes facilitating lateral expansion and sediment accretion, and thus has an important role in the salt marsh dynamics where it is considered as an ecosystem engineer, whereas S. maritima is a non-rhizomatous, genetically depauperate species (Yannic et al, 2004) with very low seed production (Marchant and Goodman, 1969;Castellanos et al, 1994;Castillo et al, 2008). Spartina maritima and S. alterniflora also exhibit chromosome number differences, as the former has a regular hexaploid number (2n ¼ 6x ¼ 60) whereas the latter presents aneuploidy (2n ¼ 62), and genome size differences (2C ¼ 3.8 pg for S. maritima and 2C ¼ 4.3 pg for S. alterniflora, Fortune et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the 19th century it was the only Spartina species known on the Atlantic European coast (Marchant and Goodman, 1969). This native species has an important role as primary colonist of intertidal mud flats since it is able to trap and stabilize sediment efficiently, thus facilitating successional development (Castillo et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%