2012
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2012.2220350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparsity-Promoting Extended Kalman Filtering for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also remark that although the dynamical system (36)-(37) is assumed to be linear, it will be evident later that the proposed sensor scheduling framework is also applicable to non-linear dynamical systems. The PDF of the initial state x 0 at time step t 0 is assumed to be Gaussian with meanx 0 and covariance matrixP 0 , wherex 0 andP 0 are estimates of the initial state and error covariance from the previous measurements obtained using filtering algorithms, such as a particle filter or a Kalman filter [37], [38]. At time step t 0 , we aim to find the optimal sensor schedule over the next τ time steps t 0 + 1, t 0 + 2, .…”
Section: Non-myopic Sensor Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also remark that although the dynamical system (36)-(37) is assumed to be linear, it will be evident later that the proposed sensor scheduling framework is also applicable to non-linear dynamical systems. The PDF of the initial state x 0 at time step t 0 is assumed to be Gaussian with meanx 0 and covariance matrixP 0 , wherex 0 andP 0 are estimates of the initial state and error covariance from the previous measurements obtained using filtering algorithms, such as a particle filter or a Kalman filter [37], [38]. At time step t 0 , we aim to find the optimal sensor schedule over the next τ time steps t 0 + 1, t 0 + 2, .…”
Section: Non-myopic Sensor Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this equation, the expectation with respect to x t is commonly calculated with the help of the prediction statex t := F t−1 F t−2 · · · F 0x0 [38], [40]. To be concrete, we approximate the PDF of x t with p(x t ) = δ(x t −x t ), where δ(·) is a δ-function.…”
Section: Non-myopic Sensor Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The past estimate and prediction can be computed from an extended Kalman filter (EKF) for instance [18]. One of the functions related to A-, E-, or D-optimality of the error covariance matrix computed using the past state estimate can then be used as a performance measure to perform selection [20]. However, since the past state estimate (not the true state) is used to compute the covariance matrix, depending on the non-linearity of the model and the noise variance, the selection will be suboptimal.…”
Section: B Sensor Selection For Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the papers assume that the signal propagation is line of sight (LOS) between the MN and the beacon nodes (BN). We can obtain an accurate distance estimation by using the filtering techniques [7]. However, the direct propagation path between the MN and the BN may be blocked by obstacles in practical applications of WSNs, such as the indoor and urban environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%