2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2016.0183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparsity‐based STAP algorithm with multiple measurement vectors via sparse Bayesian learning strategy for airborne radar

Abstract: To improve the performance of the recently developed parameter-dependent sparse recovery (SR) space-time adaptive processing (STAP) algorithms in real-world applications, the authors propose a novel clutter suppression algorithm with multiple measurement vectors (MMVs) using sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) strategy. First, the necessary and sufficient condition for uniqueness of sparse solutions to the SR STAP with MMV is derived. Then the SBL STAP algorithm in MMV case is introduced, and the process for hyperp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro-distortion detection of the lidar scanning signal could be used to improve the lidar systems. Existing micro-distortion detection technologies of lidar scanning signal have the problems of long detection time, high energy consumption, and poor performance against interference [19,20]. To deal with these problems, a technique based on geometric statistics for micro-distortion detection of the lidar signal was proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-distortion detection of the lidar scanning signal could be used to improve the lidar systems. Existing micro-distortion detection technologies of lidar scanning signal have the problems of long detection time, high energy consumption, and poor performance against interference [19,20]. To deal with these problems, a technique based on geometric statistics for micro-distortion detection of the lidar signal was proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ξ c is the clutter power, and σ v is the velocity standard deviation. Consider the ICM case with σ v = 0.1 [15]. The other simulation parameters are same as simulation A.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With the Intrinsic Clutter Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 3 provides the optimal configuration, without considering receiver constraints. However, in general, the UAV receiving platform is affected by its movement constraints and cannot achieve the conditions for optimal configuration within a short time [30]. Usually, the UAVs are far from the emitter; also, they are affected by the communication constraint and collision avoidance constraint.…”
Section: Uav Path Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%