2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6631155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparsification of motion-planning roadmaps by edge contraction

Abstract: We present Roadmap Sparsification by Edge Contraction (RSEC), a simple and effective algorithm for reducing the size of a motion-planning roadmap. The algorithm exhibits minimal effect on the quality of paths that can be extracted from the new roadmap. The primitive operation used by RSEC is edge contraction-the contraction of a roadmap edge to a single vertex and the connection of the new vertex to the neighboring vertices of the contracted edge. For certain scenarios, we compress more than 98% of the edges a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IRS has an equivalent success ratio to PRM*, but the success ratio of SPARS suffers in harder instances. provide compact alternatives with near-optimality guarantees [5], [15], [20], [24]. The evaluation of these methods presented here shows the benefits of investing computational power to compute roadmap data structures on the cloud, which are then used to answer motion-planning queries on the robot's local workstation given an updated model of its surroundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IRS has an equivalent success ratio to PRM*, but the success ratio of SPARS suffers in harder instances. provide compact alternatives with near-optimality guarantees [5], [15], [20], [24]. The evaluation of these methods presented here shows the benefits of investing computational power to compute roadmap data structures on the cloud, which are then used to answer motion-planning queries on the robot's local workstation given an updated model of its surroundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research efforts have focused on this tradeoff and aim toward compact motion-planning representations with desirable near-optimality guarantees in terms of path quality [5], [15], [20], [24]. There is a naive alternative for creating a more compact roadmap by randomly removing edges and nodes up to a desired level of sparsity.…”
Section: Effects Of Roadmap Properties On Cloud-based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, xnew is not compared in terms of its path cost with any existing tree node. The edge x selected → xnew is added to the tree and a witness at the location of xnew is added to the set of witnesses S. and others (Wang et al 2013, Shaharabani et al 2013. The discussion section of this paper describes the trade-offs that arise between computational efficiency and the type of guarantee achieved in relation to the requirement for the existence of δ-robust trajectories.…”
Section: Change In Algorithmic Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anytime (Karaman et al, 2011) and lazy (Alterovitz et al, 2011) variants of RRT* have also been proposed. There are also techniques that provide asymptotic near-optimality using sparse roadmaps, which inspire the current work (Dobson and Bekris, 2014; Dobson et al, 2012; Marble and Bekris, 2011, 2013; Shaharabani et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013). Sparse trees appear in the context of feedback-based motion planning (Tedrake, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the references mentioned do not consider storage requirements for their roadmaps. (Shaharabani et al 2013) (Dobson and Bekris 2014) propose algorithms to reduce the size of path planning roadmaps. However, these algorithms applied in the context of surgical training will result in loss of coverage, connectivity and quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%