2020
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/abb834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse-view, short-scan, dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography: image quality assessment

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to quantify the impact of sparse-view acquisition in short-scan trajectories, compared to 360-degrees full-scan acquisition, on image quality measures in dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography (BCT). Projection data from 30 full-scan (360-degrees; 300 views) BCT exams with calcified lesions were selected from an existing clinical research database. Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) reconstruction of the full-scan data served as the reference. Projection data corresponding to two s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the system used to acquire the clinical datasets in this study, the estimated MGD reduction with a shortscan trajectory inferior to the breast and spanning 205 • is 52.2%. If a short-scan trajectory spanning 270 • as suggested by a recent study 32 is considered, then the estimated MGD reduction is 35.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the system used to acquire the clinical datasets in this study, the estimated MGD reduction with a shortscan trajectory inferior to the breast and spanning 205 • is 52.2%. If a short-scan trajectory spanning 270 • as suggested by a recent study 32 is considered, then the estimated MGD reduction is 35.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation for this study is derived from our ongoing research on the potential of short-scan trajectory in CBBCT. Short-scan acquisitions with appropriate image reconstruction algorithms [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] are known to be one of the effective methods to reduce radiation dose. For such short-scan acquisition in CBBCT, it is important to determine the trajectory of the x-ray source movement along an arc in terms of the start and stop angles of the arc, with an objective of minimizing the radiation dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since visualization of microcalcifications at MGD suitable for screening (Lindfors et al 2008) is the main challenge, 30 cases with calcifications were selected for this study. The same set of 30 cases was also used in a study investigating short-scan, sparse-view dedicated cone-beam BCT, and hence the subject characteristics summarized in table 1 of that prior study (Tseng et al 2020a) are identical to this study. Briefly, the median (interquartile range) for age, diameter at chest-wall, fibroglandular weight fraction, and the MGD for this cohort were 51 (46-57) years, 13.5 (12-15.1) cm, 11.7 (7.3-19.5) %, and 11.4 (9.9-14.4) mGy, respectively.…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For full-scan acquisition, the evaluation of image reconstruction techniques using compressed sensing in conjunction with offset geometry is important in reducing the mean glandular dose (MGD) from breast CT (Tseng et al 2021) so that it is comparable to a standard 2-view screening mammography exam. An alternative is to use short-scan acquisition (Tseng et al 2020a). Reducing the radiation dose is essential for translating breast CT for breast cancer screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our best knowledge, studies in literature only considered 𝐷𝑔𝑁 𝐶𝑇 , but none have considered the variation of the 𝐷𝑔𝑁 𝐶𝑇 with the projection angles, i.e., angular 𝐷𝑔𝑁 𝐶𝑇 . We are particularly interested in 𝐷𝑔𝑁 𝐶𝑇 because we have developed feasible image reconstruction algorithms for short-scan and sparse-view acquisitions [12], [13], and we would like to understand which angular range should be used for short-scan acquisition to reduce the radiation to the breast either for prone or upright patient-position CBBCT systems. A cohort of 75 CBBCT datasets from a research database of subjects who had participated in a prior IRB-approved clinical trial was used in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%