2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9111166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data with Noise Level Estimation

Abstract: Abstract:Recently, sparse unmixing has received particular attention in the analysis of hyperspectral images (HSIs). However, traditional sparse unmixing ignores the different noise levels in different bands of HSIs, making such methods sensitive to different noise levels. To overcome this problem, the noise levels at different bands are assumed to be different in this paper, and a general sparse unmixing method based on noise level estimation (SU-NLE) under the sparse regression framework is proposed. First, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hyperspectral images (HSIs) are usually acquired in hundreds of narrow contiguous spectral bands by a specific kind of imaging sensor, e.g., the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer, Hyperspectral Digital Imagery Collection Experiment and Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager [1][2][3]. Due to the high spectral resolution, it is inevitable to bring about the problem of "mixed pixels", and different materials usually occupy a single hyperspectral pixel [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral images (HSIs) are usually acquired in hundreds of narrow contiguous spectral bands by a specific kind of imaging sensor, e.g., the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer, Hyperspectral Digital Imagery Collection Experiment and Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager [1][2][3]. Due to the high spectral resolution, it is inevitable to bring about the problem of "mixed pixels", and different materials usually occupy a single hyperspectral pixel [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular sparse unmixing methods like-variable splitting and augmented Lagrangian (SUnSAL) [30] employed l 1 sparsity term, collaborative SUnSAL algorithm [31] combined collaborative sparse regression with the sparsity promoting term, whereas, SUnSAL-TV [32] introduced a total variation regularization term in the sparse unmixing. Among the sparse unmixing methods for abundance estimation robust sparse unmixing [33,34] method incorporates a redundant regularization term to account for endmember variability, joint local abundance method [35] performs local unmixing by exploiting structural information of image, co-evolutionary approach [36] formulates a multi-objective strategy and minimize it by evolutionary algorithm. Other works such as Feng et al [37] proposed a spatial regularization framework which employs maximum a posteriori estimation, Themelis et al [38] introduced a hierarchical Bayesian model based sparse unmixing method, Zhang et al [39] transform data in framelet domain and maximize the sparsity of the obtained abundance matrix, Zhu et al [40] proposed a correntropy maximization approach for sparse unmixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works such as Feng et al [37] proposed a spatial regularization framework which employs maximum a posteriori estimation, Themelis et al [38] introduced a hierarchical Bayesian model based sparse unmixing method, Zhang et al [39] transform data in framelet domain and maximize the sparsity of the obtained abundance matrix, Zhu et al [40] proposed a correntropy maximization approach for sparse unmixing. Some recent works such as Li et al [34], Feng et al [41], Mei et al [42] used spatial information alongside spectral properties of the data. Since sparse unmixing consider the whole spectral library as endmember.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method was compared with three state-of-the-art sparse unmixing algorithms: Sparse Unmixing via variable Splitting and Augmented Lagrangian (SUnSAL), Sparse Unmixing method based on Noise Level Estimation (SU-NLE) [49], Sparse Unmixing via variable Splitting and Augmented Lagrangian and Total Variation (SUnSAL-TV), and Non-Local Sparse Unmixing (NLSU). The accuracy assessment of all the experiments in this paper was made by the Signal-to-Reconstruction Error (SRE) [50], which is defined as follows:…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%