2016
DOI: 10.1137/15m1036713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Sensor Placement Optimization for Classification

Abstract: Abstract. Choosing a limited set of sensor locations to characterize or classify a high-dimensional system is an important challenge in engineering design. Traditionally, optimizing the sensor locations involves a brute-force, combinatorial search, which is NP-hard and is computationally intractable for even moderately large problems. Using recent advances in sparsity-promoting techniques, we present a novel algorithm to solve this sparse sensor placement optimization for classification (SSPOC) that exploits l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the context of modeling physical systems, classification relies on additional design choices, such as sensor placement. Classification methods that explicitly take into account the placement of sensors have been recently shown to successfully classify states of dynamical systems into regimes of characteristic behaviors [12,39,11,23,10], and further improvements are ongoing. The suitability of a given classification approach also depends on the problem character.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the context of modeling physical systems, classification relies on additional design choices, such as sensor placement. Classification methods that explicitly take into account the placement of sensors have been recently shown to successfully classify states of dynamical systems into regimes of characteristic behaviors [12,39,11,23,10], and further improvements are ongoing. The suitability of a given classification approach also depends on the problem character.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, based on the robust principal components obtained from historical data, we design a small subset of key spatial measurement locations that best inform the shim gap distribution of a new aircraft. Our procedure, called PIXel Identification Despite Uncertainty in Sensor Technology (PIXI-DUST), is based on recent advances in convex optimization for sensor placement (Brunton et al, 2016;Manohar et al, 2017a,b). We demonstrate the success of PIXI-DUST on historical production data from 54 Boeing aircraft, predicting 99% of the shim gaps within the desired measurement tolerance using approximately 3% of the available laser scan data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clusterbased reduced-order modeling (CROM) [3] was recently introduced to approximate the Perron-Frobenius operator in an unsupervised manner from high-dimensional data yielding a low-dimensional, linear model in probability space. The present work combines CROM with sparsity-promoting techniques, particularly the sparse sensor placement optimization for classification (SSPOC) architecture [4], as a critical enabler for real-time prediction and control. The sparsity enabled CROM identifies the probabilistic dynamics from few optimized measurements or compressed data facilitating its application for online prediction, estimation, and control and faster computations for high-dimensional systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%