2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse representation-based volumetric super-resolution algorithm for 3D CT images of reservoir rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, HR images are usually with a small FOV, thereby resulting in decreased representativeness. Recent studies [7][8][9][10][11] show that this bottleneck can be addressed to some extent via super-resolution (SR), which maps a LR input to a space of higher resolution [12]. HR rock MCT images with a large FOV can be obtained by applying SR algorithms to the collected LR MCT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, HR images are usually with a small FOV, thereby resulting in decreased representativeness. Recent studies [7][8][9][10][11] show that this bottleneck can be addressed to some extent via super-resolution (SR), which maps a LR input to a space of higher resolution [12]. HR rock MCT images with a large FOV can be obtained by applying SR algorithms to the collected LR MCT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some studies for the SR of 3D rock images. For example, Li et al [10] presented a sparse representation-based 3D volumetric SR framework. Wang et al [11] extended the VDSR for 3D rock MCT images SR via introducing 3D convolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SSIM ranges between 0 and 1, where a higher SSIM value shows more similarity. Evaluation via PSNR and SSIM demonstrated better performance of 3D‐SRCNN (Wang, Armstrong, & Mostaghimi, 2020) compared to some other models like 2D‐VDSR (Manjón et al., 2010), 3D‐Sparse representation (Z. Li et al., 2017) and 3DA+ (Zhang, 2018).…”
Section: Image Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to its inherent limitations of CT devices, setting high resolution will not only need high cost, but will result in decrease of field of view (FOV), causing the loss of long-range properties of reservoirs rock. 11 In many cases, there are only LR CT images available for analysis. Therefore, the use of super resolution(SR) algorithm is an effective method to improve the resolution of CT images, which can provide more clear sample data for subsequent geological research or medical diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%