2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse recovery with coherent tight frames via analysis Dantzig selector and analysis LASSO

Abstract: This article considers recovery of signals that are sparse or approximately sparse in terms of a (possibly) highly overcomplete and coherent tight frame from undersampled data corrupted with additive noise. We show that the properly constrained l 1 -analysis optimization problem, called analysis Dantzig selector, stably recovers a signal which is nearly sparse in terms of a tight frame provided that the measurement matrix satisfies a restricted isometry property adapted to the tight frame. As a special case, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a special case, choosing ρ → ∞ extends the bound in (6) and obtains the reconstruction bound for ALASSO (4) as long as σ 2s < 0.1907, which improves upon the results of [28].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a special case, choosing ρ → ∞ extends the bound in (6) and obtains the reconstruction bound for ALASSO (4) as long as σ 2s < 0.1907, which improves upon the results of [28].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…A similar performance bound is introduced in [28] and shown to be valid when σ 3s < 0.25. Using Corollary 3.4 in [35], this is equivalent to σ 2s < 0.0833.…”
Section: When Dmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some sufficient conditions are provided to guarantee the stable recovery via solving analysis based approaches. Compared with the previous work [12,16], our sufficient conditions are weaker and the estimations of l 2 bound only depend on the measurement matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%