1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.13623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse-random-matrix configurations for two or three interacting electrons in a random potential

Abstract: We investigate the random matrix configurations for two or three interacting electrons in one-dimensional disordered systems. In a suitable non-interacting localized electron basis we obtain a sparse random matrix with very long tails which is different from a superimposed random band matrix usually thought to be valid. The number of non-zero off-diagonal matrix elements is shown to decay very weakly from the matrix diagonal and the non-zero matrix elements are distributed according to a Lorentzian around zero… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An appropriate random matrix model gave similar results as the one proposed by Shepelyansky [6]. Xiong and Evangelou derived similar results for the two-and threeparticle interaction matrix, the latter was only more sparse than the former [158].…”
Section: Interaction Matrixsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An appropriate random matrix model gave similar results as the one proposed by Shepelyansky [6]. Xiong and Evangelou derived similar results for the two-and threeparticle interaction matrix, the latter was only more sparse than the former [158].…”
Section: Interaction Matrixsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The most detailed analysis was performed by Ro ¨mer et al [159]. As also observed in [93,101,158], all diagonal elements were positive and depended on the sign of the interaction. The distribution of off-diagonal elements was symmetric around zero but strongly non-Gaussian, in contrast to the assumption by most authors which had mapped the two-particle problem onto random matrix models.…”
Section: Interaction Matrixmentioning
confidence: 95%