2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13142664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Label Assignment for Oriented Object Detection in Aerial Images

Abstract: Object detection in aerial images has received extensive attention in recent years. The current mainstream anchor-based methods directly divide the training samples into positives and negatives according to the intersection-over-unit (IoU) of the preset anchors. This label assignment strategy assigns densely arranged samples for training, which leads to a suboptimal learning process and cause the model to suffer serious duplicate detections and missed detections. In this paper, we propose a sparse label assign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ablation study, we considered three typical detection frameworks: Axis Learning [49], Rotation-Sensitive Regression Detector (RRD) [50], and Sparse Label Assignment (SLA) [51]. Axis Learning is a one-stage, anchor-free method with a new aspect-ratio-aware orientation centerness method for large-aspect-ratio detection.…”
Section: Performance Comparison For Ship Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the ablation study, we considered three typical detection frameworks: Axis Learning [49], Rotation-Sensitive Regression Detector (RRD) [50], and Sparse Label Assignment (SLA) [51]. Axis Learning is a one-stage, anchor-free method with a new aspect-ratio-aware orientation centerness method for large-aspect-ratio detection.…”
Section: Performance Comparison For Ship Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean average precision (mAP07) was calculated based on the visual object classes (VOC) 07 method which was proposed by the Pascal VOC Challenge [52]. As shown in the Table 4, on the HRSC2016 dataset, the CNN-Swin backbone we proposed surpassed all the other backbones from different state-of-the-art methods, including Axis Learning [49], RRD [50], and SLA [51]. With the CNN-Swin backbone we proposed, Axis Learning, RRD, and SLA obtained 67.23%, 90.67%, and 90.56% mAP values, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Comparison For Ship Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, mainstream oriented object detectors [20][21][22][23] are based on densely placed predefined anchors. Several early rotation detectors use a horizontal anchor-based Region Proposal Network (RPN) to generate horizontal regions of interest (RoIs), and then design novel network modules to convert the horizontal RoIs into OBBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the research of rotated object detection in remote sensing images is of great significance for engineering applications. In recent years, rotated object detection has been derived from classic object detection [27][28][29], and most existing methods use five parameters (coordinates of the central point, width, height, and rotation angle) to describe the oriented bounding box. The initial exploration of rotated object detection involves rotating the RPN [30]; however, it involves more anchors, which implies that additional running time is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%