2020
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201960218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse‐graph manifold learning method for bioluminescence tomography

Abstract: In preclinical researches, bioluminescence tomography (BLT) has widely been used for tumor imaging and monitoring, imaged-guided tumor therapy, and so forth. For these biological applications, both tumor spatial location and morphology analysis are the leading problems needed to be taken into account. However, most existing BLT reconstruction methods were proposed for some specific applications with a focus on sparse representation or morphology recovery, respectively. How to design a versatile algorithm that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, employing SCAD regularization in FMT reconstruction yields sparser and more accurate solutions compared to using L0 or L1 regularization alone, resulting in improved FMT reconstruction accuracy. However, it is important to note that increasing sparsity in reconstruction results may lead to potential loss of morphological details (Guo et al 2020). Inspired by graph-based manifold learning and sparse representation theory, we propose a novel approach called SCAD-GML for regularized FMT reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, employing SCAD regularization in FMT reconstruction yields sparser and more accurate solutions compared to using L0 or L1 regularization alone, resulting in improved FMT reconstruction accuracy. However, it is important to note that increasing sparsity in reconstruction results may lead to potential loss of morphological details (Guo et al 2020). Inspired by graph-based manifold learning and sparse representation theory, we propose a novel approach called SCAD-GML for regularized FMT reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L 1 -norm regularization results in over-sparseness in reconstruction. To overcome these problems, some new methods based on joint regularization, such as sparse-graph manifold learning (SGML) (Guo et al 2020) and L 1 −L 2 norm regulation via difference of convex algorithm (L 1 −L 2 via DCA) algorithm (Zhang et al 2016) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] Although these traditional model-driven methods can achieve a high-quality reconstruction result and enjoy the advantage of interpretability, due to the iterative nature of the solutions and the handcrafted characteristics, they suffer from high computational complexity. 15,16 Fueled by the rise of deep learning, several data-driven deep neural methods have been recently proposed for BLT reconstruction by direct learning the inverse mapping from the body surface information to the internal bio-distribution. 17,18 Compared to the model-driven methods, the data-driven deep neural methods dramatically reduce time complexity due to their non-iterative nature of the solutions and achieve impressive reconstruction performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, based on the light propagation model in biological tissues, the inversion algorithm is used to recover the three-dimensional (3D) distribution of the internal bioluminescent sources that enables quantitatively monitoring the pathological and physiological changes of the biological entities (4). In the past decade, BLT has been widely applied in preclinical studies such as early detection of tumors, monitoring tumor growth, and metastatic spreading (5)(6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%