2000
DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5456.1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Coding and Decorrelation in Primary Visual Cortex During Natural Vision

Abstract: Theoretical studies suggest that primary visual cortex (area V1) uses a sparse code to efficiently represent natural scenes. This issue was investigated by recording from V1 neurons in awake behaving macaques during both free viewing of natural scenes and conditions simulating natural vision. Stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases the selectivity and sparseness of individual V1 neurons, increases the sparseness of the population response distribution, and strongly decorrelates the responses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

72
993
4
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,112 publications
(1,075 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
72
993
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5B). The results were qualitatively similar when sparseness (see Rolls & Tovee, 1995;Vinje & Gallant, 2000;Friedrich & Laurent, 2001), instead of SSI, was taken as a measure of the peakedness of the response profile (data not shown).…”
Section: Individual V2 Cells Carry Information About Many Shape Charamentioning
confidence: 58%
“…5B). The results were qualitatively similar when sparseness (see Rolls & Tovee, 1995;Vinje & Gallant, 2000;Friedrich & Laurent, 2001), instead of SSI, was taken as a measure of the peakedness of the response profile (data not shown).…”
Section: Individual V2 Cells Carry Information About Many Shape Charamentioning
confidence: 58%
“…To meet the challenge we must modify both our experimental designs and our methods for analyzing the responses to these much more complicated inputs. Recent examples of laboratory based approaches to the problem of natural stimulation are studies of bullfrog auditory neurons responding to synthesized frog calls (Rieke et al , 1995), insect olfactory neurons responding to odour plumes (Vickers et al , 2001), cat LGN cells responding to movies (Dan et al , 1996, Stanley et al , 1999, primate visual cortical cells during free viewing of natural images (Gallant et al , 1998, Vinje andGallant, 2000), auditory neurons in song birds stimulated by song and song-like signals (Theunissen and Doupe, 1998, Theunissen et al , 2000, the responses in cat auditory cortex to signals with naturalistic statistical properties (Rotman et al , 1999), and motion sensitive cells in the fly Egelhaaf, 2001, de Ruyter van Steveninck et al , 2001). In each case compromises are struck between well controlled stimuli with understandable statistical properties and the fully natural case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the frequency of H3-patterns in relation to a behavior is in the range of the rare single spike activity of many neuronal subpopulations, including numerous cortico-cortical, cortico-thalamic, and cortico-striatal projecting populations in mammals [8,9,10,56,60,66,67,68,71], as well as a group of neurons that connect two song-production nuclei in song birds [30]. Although in most of these cases the functional role of such sparse firing is yet to be determined, it seems to be computationally efficient in visual processing [73] and in songs learning in songbirds [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%